Ecological Risk Assessment and Environmental Policy Analysis Based on Bayesian Networks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/xewhhv72Keywords:
Bayesian network, ecological risk assessment, environmental policy analysis, uncertainty quantification.Abstract
At present, ecological and environmental problems are becoming increasingly serious. Traditional risk assessment methods are difficult to fully integrate the complex relationships among multiple variables and lack the ability to dynamically analyze uncertainty and conditional dependence, which affects the scientific nature of environmental policies. To address this problem, this paper proposes an ecological risk assessment and environmental policy analysis framework based on Bayesian networks, aiming to effectively quantify ecological risks and provide support for policy decisions. In terms of methodology, first, a Bayesian network structure is constructed with ecosystem elements as nodes and causal relationships as edges; second, the conditional probability table is determined by combining expert knowledge with historical data; then, node sensitivity analysis and scenario simulation are carried out to identify key risk factors and sources of uncertainty; finally, the regulatory effect of policy intervention on risks is evaluated. The study took a typical river basin as an example, and the results showed that driven by pollutant concentrations and land use changes, the river basin ecosystem risk index reached 0.72, among which water quality deterioration and biodiversity decline were the main sources of risk; policy simulation showed that by increasing sewage treatment rate and vegetation coverage rate, the risk index could be reduced to 0.48, a reduction of 33.3%. Studies have shown that Bayesian networks can effectively reveal causal relationships and the impact of policy interventions in complex ecosystems, providing a scientific basis for the precise formulation of environmental policies.
Downloads
References
[1] Yin Z. Distribution and ecological risk assessment of typical antibiotics in the surface waters of seven major rivers, China[J]. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 2021, 23(8): 1088-1100.
[2] Ankley G T, Cureton P, Hoke R A, et al. Assessing the ecological risks of per‐and polyfluoroalkyl substances: Current state‐of‐the science and a proposed path forward[J]. Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2021, 40(3): 564-605.
[3] Jian-Hua Y E, Tao Y U, Zhe-Ting X U, et al. Distribution and probabilistic integrated ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in the surface water of Poyang Lake, China[J]. Chinese journal of analytical chemistry, 2021, 49(11): 29-34.
[4] Wang S, Qian J, Zhang B, et al. Unveiling the occurrence and potential ecological risks of organophosphate esters in municipal wastewater treatment plants across China[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2023, 57(5): 1907-1918.
[5] Xiao Q, Zong Y, Malik Z, et al. Source identification and risk assessment of heavy metals in road dust of steel industrial city (Anshan), Liaoning, Northeast China[J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 2020, 26(5): 1359-1378.
[6] Egbueri J C. Heavy metals pollution source identification and probabilistic health risk assessment of shallow groundwater in Onitsha, Nigeria[J]. Analytical letters, 2020, 53(10): 1620-1638.
[7] Kaikkonen L, Parviainen T, Rahikainen M, et al. Bayesian networks in environmental risk assessment: A review[J]. Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2021, 17(1): 62-78.
[8] Hoque M M M, Sarker A, Sarker M E, et al. Heavy metals in sediments of an urban river at the vicinity of tannery industries in Bangladesh: a preliminary study for ecological and human health risk[J]. International journal of environmental analytical chemistry, 2023, 103(19): 7909-7927.
[9] Wang M, Yu H, Bell Z, et al. Constructing an edu-metaverse ecosystem: A new and innovative framework[J]. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2022, 15(6): 685-696.
[10] Díaz S, Malhi Y. Biodiversity: Concepts, patterns, trends, and perspectives[J]. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2022, 47(1): 31-63.
[11] Chu B, Ma Q, Liu J, et al. Air pollutant correlations in China: secondary air pollutant responses to NO x and SO2 control[J]. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2020, 7(10): 695-700.
[12] Kitson N K, Constantinou A C, Guo Z, et al. A survey of Bayesian Network structure learning[J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2023, 56(8): 8721-8814.
[13] Rodrigues Mendes Ribeiro R, Natal J, Polpo de Campos C, et al. Conditional probability table limit-based quantization for Bayesian networks: model quality, data fidelity and structure score[J]. Applied Intelligence, 2024, 54(6): 4668-4688.
[14] Liu Y, Liu B. A modified uncertain maximum likelihood estimation with applications in uncertain statistics[J]. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 2024, 53 (18): 6649-6670.
[15] Lu X, Borgonovo E. Global sensitivity analysis in epidemiological modeling[J]. European journal of operational research, 2023, 304(1): 9-24.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Academic Journal of Science and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








