Shale Gas Fracturing Construction Parameter Optimization Based on SSA-XGBoost
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/kqaa3273Keywords:
Hydraulic Fracturing; Grey Relational Analysis; Sparrow Search Algorithm; Extreme Gradient Boosting; Production Prediction; Parameter Optimization.Abstract
To address the challenges of poor model performance, low prediction accuracy, and suboptimal application of intelligent optimization algorithms for hydraulic fracturing parameter optimization in shale gas production, this study proposes a novel optimization method based on the SSA-XGBoost algorithm. First, using production data from 120 wells with complete records in the Y block, grey relational analysis (GRA) was employed to reduce dimensionality among 14 factors affecting fracturing performance, resulting in the selection of nine primary controlling factors. Based on the mapping relationship between these controlling factors and the fracturing performance evaluation index (daily gas production), the Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA) was applied to optimize the hyperparameters of the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model. The resulting SSA-XGBoost-based shale gas production prediction model improved the coefficient of determination (R2) by 5.6% compared to the original model, achieving significantly enhanced prediction accuracy and outperforming existing models in the field. Finally, based on the production predictions of the optimized model, the optimal parameter ranges for hydraulic fracturing were determined, yielding normalized daily gas production 27.50% higher than that of benchmark wells. These findings demonstrate the rationality and accuracy of the proposed optimization approach, providing valuable reference for on-site fracturing parameter design.
Downloads
References
[1] X.S.Guo, B.J Tenger,X.F.Wei,et al. Occurrence mechanism and exploration potential of deep marine shale gas in Sichuan Basin.Acta Petrolei Sinica.2022,Vol.43(No.4),p.453-468.(In Chinese)
[2] H. Zhang, J. Sheng. Optimization of horizontal well fracturing in shale gas reservoir based on stimulated reservoir volume.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2020, Vol.190,p. 107059
[3] T.Y. Luo, J.Z. Zhao, J.H. Wang, et al. Multiple-Transverse-Fracture extension model for Hydraulic fracturing.Natural Gas Industry.2007,Vol. 27 (No. 10) No. 10, p. 75-78 + 139. (In Chinese)
[4] X. Shi, Y.F. Cheng, X. Chang, et al. Establishment and application of the model for the synchronous propagation of multi-cluster fractures in the horizontal section of shale-gas horizontal well.Oil Drilling & Production Technology. 2018, Vol.40 (No.2),p. 247-252. (In Chinese)
[5] C. Liu. Numerical investigating the hydraulic fracturing of horizontal well and the optimization of stimulation parameters, University of Science and Technology of China, 2017. (In Chinese)
[6] R.H. Zhang, L.H. Zhang, H.Y. Tang, et al. A Simulator for Production Prediction of Multistage Fractured Horizontal Well in Shale Gas Reservoir Considering Complex Fracture Geometry.Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2019,Vol. 66 , p. 106537.
[7] Y.W. He, Z.Y. He, Y. Tang, et al. Shale gas well production evaluation and prediction based on machine learning.Oil Drilling & Production Technology.2021, Vol. 43 (No. 4), p. 518-524. (In Chinese)
[8] X.T. Peng, Y. Wang, C. Jia, et al. Fracturing effect prediction based on sparrow search algorithm and BP neural network, Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2022,Vol. 44 (No.42) , p. 522-528. (In Chinese)
[9] M. Sheng, G.S. Li, S.C. Tian, et al. Research Status and Prospect of Artificial Intelligence in Reservoir Fracturing Stimulation, Drilling & Production Technology, Vol. 45 (2022) No. 4, p. 1-8. (In Chinese)
[10] K. Lee, J. Lim, D. Yoon, et al. Prediction of Shale-Gas Production at Duvernay Formation Using Deep-Learning Algorithm.SPE Journal.2019,Vol. 24 (No. 6) , p. 1317-1325.
[11] C.D. Tan, J.Z. Yang, M.Y. Cui, et al. Fracturing Productivity Prediction Model and Optimization of the Operation Parameters of Shale Gas Well Based on Machine Learning.Lithosphere.2024,Special Issue 4 , p. 2884679.
[12] L. Wang, Y. Yao, K. Wang, et al. Data-driven multi-objective optimization design method for shale gas fracturing parameters. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2022,Vol. 99 ,p. 104420.
[13] X.W. Liu, D.P. Li, Y.P. Jia, et al. Optimizing construction parameters for fractured horizontal wells in shale oil. Frontiers in Earth Science.2023,Vol.10 , p. 1015107.
[14] S. Qian, Z. Dong, Q. Shi, et al. Optimization of shale gas fracturing parameters based on artificial intelligence algorithm.Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences. 2023,Vol. 4, p. 95-110.
[15] Z. Dong, L. Wu, L. Wang, et al. Optimization of Fracturing Parameters with Machine-Learning and Evolutionary Algorithm Methods. Energies.2022,Vol. 15 (No.16), p. 6063.
[16] X. Zhou, Q. Ran. Optimization of fracturing parameters by modified genetic algorithm in shale gas reservoir. Energies. 2023, Vol. 16 (No. 6) , p. 2868.
[17] H. Yang, X. Liu, X. Chu, et al. Optimization of tight gas reservoir fracturing parameters via gradient boosting regression modeling. Heliyon.2024,Vol. 10 , p. e14092.
[18] D.L. Guo, Y.F. Tang, S.G. Li, et al. Optimization of Tight Gas Fracturing Operation Parameters Based on BP-PSO.Science Technology and Engineering.2022,Vol. 22 (No. 19) , p. 8304-8312. (In Chinese)
[19] Z.Z. Zhou, J.Q. Tang, Y.M. Huang, et al. Optimization of Fracturing Parameters for Horizontal Wells in Block A of Aonan Oilfield. Mathematics in Practice and Theory. 2021,Vol. 51 (No. 20) , p. 65-72. (In Chinese)
[20] M. Wang M, G. Hui G,Y. Pang Y, et al. Optimization of machine learning approaches for shale gas production forecast. Geoenergy Science and Engineering.2023, 226: p.211719.
[21] Q. Wang, H.W. Qin, C.S. Qi, et al. Improved XGBoost temperature prediction method based on SA-PSO. Electronic Measurement Technology.2023,Vol. 46 (No.7) , p. 67-72.
[22] J. Xue, B. Shen. A novel swarm intelligence optimization approach: sparrow search algorithm.Systems Science & Control Engineering: An Open Access Journal. 2020,Vol. 8 (No.1) , p. 22-34.
[23] R.C. Liu, J.X. Li, J. Liu, et al. A Survey on Dynamic Multi Objective Optimization. Chinese Journal of Computers. 2020, Vol. 43 (No. 7) , p. 1246-1278.
[24] X.Y. Hou, H.Y. Lu, M.D. Lu, et al. Bidirectional Learning Equilibrium Optimizer Combining Sparrow Search and Random Difference. Computer Science.2023, Vol. 50 (No.11), p. 248-258.
[25] C. Zhang, Y. He, L. Yuan, et al. Capacity Prognostics of Lithium-ion Batteries using EMD Denoising and Multiple Kernel RVM.IEEE Access.2017, p.1-1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Academic Journal of Science and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








