Liquid Transportation Distance Prediction Method for LNG Long-distance Pipeline Based on LSTM Algorithm

Authors

  • Zifan Xu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/xcehd884

Keywords:

LNG pipeline; transportation distance prediction; LSTM algorithm; time series analysis; deep learning; energy transportation optimization.

Abstract

Accurate prediction of liquid transportation distance in LNG long-distance pipelines is critical for optimizing energy transportation efficiency and ensuring operational safety. However, traditional methods often struggle to capture the nonlinear temporal dependencies and complex flow dynamics inherent in pipeline systems. This paper proposes a novel prediction method based on the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) algorithm to address these challenges. By leveraging historical operational data, including pressure, temperature, flow rate, and pipeline terrain characteristics, the LSTM model is trained to learn spatiotemporal patterns and predict transportation distances under varying conditions. The proposed framework incorporates data preprocessing, feature selection, and hyperparameter optimization to enhance model robustness. Experimental results demonstrate that the LSTM-based method outperforms conventional models in terms of prediction accuracy, achieving a mean absolute error of 0.82 km and a root mean square error of 1.15 km over a 200 km test pipeline segment. The model’s ability to handle long-term dependencies and noisy data highlights its practical applicability for real-time monitoring and decision-making in LNG pipeline management. This study contributes to advancing intelligent solutions for energy infrastructure optimization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Howarth R W. The greenhouse gas footprint of liquefied natural gas (LNG) exported from the United States[J]. Energy Science & Engineering, 2024, 12(11): 4843-4859.

[2] Nubli H, Jung D, Kim S J, et al. Structural impact under accidental LNG release on the LNG bunkering ship: Implementation of advanced cryogenic risk analysis[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2024, 186: 329-347.

[3] Zhu Y, Allen D T, Ravikumar A P. Geospatial life cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from US liquefied natural gas supply chains[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2024, 12(49): 17843-17854.

[4] Ghiyami M, Bahramian A, Sedaee B. Development and performance assessment of a novel multigeneration clean energy system based on biomass-LNG using a dynamic model and supervised learning algorithms[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 66: 10-23.

[5] Balali A, Moghimi M. Energy system design based on municipal solid waste gasification and SOFC for multi-demand applications through multi-heat recovery approach: 4E assessment and machine learning optimization[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2025.

[6] Al-Selwi S M, Hassan M F, Abdulkadir S J, et al. RNN-LSTM: From applications to modeling techniques and beyond—Systematic review[J]. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 2024: 102068.

[7] Xiang P, Zhang P, Zhao H, et al. Seismic response prediction of a train-bridge coupled system based on a LSTM neural network[J]. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 2024, 52(8): 5673-5695.

[8] Kurani A, Doshi P, Vakharia A, et al. A comprehensive comparative study of artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machines (SVM) on stock forecasting[J]. Annals of Data Science, 2023, 10(1): 183-208.

[9] Zhang B, Xu N, Wang B, et al. A mathematical framework for modeling and designing a long distance cryogenic liquefied natural gas pipeline: A practical study and analysis in Shandong, China[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2024, 312: 118516.

[10] Xu K, Hu J, Zhang L, et al. A risk factor tracing method for LNG receiving terminals based on GAT and a bidirectional LSTM network[J]. Process safety and environmental protection, 2023, 170: 694-708.

[11] Wu Y, Yang G, Sun J, et al. Digital twin modeling and leak diagnosis of temperature and stress fields in LNG storage tanks[J]. Measurement, 2024, 228: 114374.

[12] Oyewola D O, Akinwunmi S A, Omotehinwa T O. Deep LSTM and LSTM-Attention Q-learning based reinforcement learning in oil and gas sector prediction[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2024, 284: 111290.

Downloads

Published

12-02-2025

Issue

Section

Articles