Delay-Optimized Design of a 4-Bit Absolute Value Detector Energy-Efficiency Analysis for Embedded Signal Processing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/n4dbp937Keywords:
Component; Absolute value detector; Logical effort method; Critical path optimization; Delay-energy tradeoff.Abstract
In low-power digital signal processing and embedded systems, the absolute value detector serves as a fundamental arithmetic unit whose performance directly impacts system efficiency. This paper proposes a delay-energy co-optimization design methodology for a 4-bit absolute value detector based on the logical effort method. Through critical path analysis, we identify the conditional increment module as the primary bottleneck and leverage the constraint excluding the input -8 (minimum 4-bit two's complement value) for structural optimization. The traditional implementation exhibits a 13-stage logic gate critical path with a minimum delay of 68.5τ. By treating -8 as a don't-care term in our custom adder design, we significantly simplify logic expressions. This reduces the critical path from 13 stages to 7 stages and lowers the minimum delay to 43τ, reaching 37% performance improvement. The logical effort per stage increases from 1.96 to 2.44, approaching the ideal operating point. For energy optimization, voltage scaling is employed under the constraint that delay remains within 1.5× the minimum value. Reducing the supply voltage from 1V to 0.775V yields 40% energy reduction at the cost of 50% delay increase. Key contributions include: (1) A constraint-driven structural optimization methodology; (2) A complete design flow from theory to implementation; (3) Validation of voltage scaling for energy efficiency under delay constraints. This approach demonstrates excellent implement ability in standard CMOS processes and offers valuable insights for arithmetic unit design in low-power embedded systems.
Downloads
References
[1] A. P. Chandrakasan and R. W. Brodersen, "Minimizing power consumption in digital CMOS circuits," Proc. IEEE, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 498-523, April 1995.
[2] A. P. Chandrakasan, S. Sheng, and R. W. Brodersen, "Low-power CMOS digital design," IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 473-484, April 1992.
[3] I. Sutherland, B. Sproull, and D. Harris, Logical Effort: Designing Fast CMOS Circuits. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1999.
[4] N. H. E. Weste and D. M. Harris, CMOS VLSI Design: A Circuits and Systems Perspective, 4th ed. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley, 2011.
[5] T. Sakurai and A. R. Newton, "Alpha-power law MOSFET model and its applications to CMOS inverter delay and other formulas," IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 584-594, April 1990.
[6] M. Horowitz, T. Indermaur, and R. Gonzalez, "Low-power digital design," Proc. 1994 IEEE Symp. Low Power Electronics, San Diego, CA, USA, Oct. 1994, pp. 8-11.
[7] R. P. Brent and H. T. Kung, "A regular layout for parallel adders," IEEE Trans. Computers, vol. C-31, no. 3, pp. 260-264, March 1982.
[8] J. M. Rabaey, A. Chandrakasan, and B. Nikolic, Digital Integrated Circuits: A Design Perspective, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003.
[9] P. M. Kogge and H. S. Stone, "A parallel algorithm for the efficient solution of a general class of recurrence equations," IEEE Trans. Computers, vol. C-22, no. 8, pp. 786-793, August 1973.
[10] O. J. Bedrij, "Carry-select adder," IRE Trans. Electronic Computers, vol. EC-11, no. 3, pp. 340-346, June 1962.
[11] C. E. Shannon, "A symbolic analysis of relay and switching circuits," Trans. AIEE, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 713-723, December 1938.
[12] T. D. Burd and R. W. Brodersen, "Design issues for dynamic voltage scaling," Proc. 2000 Int. Symp. Low Power Electronics and Design (ISLPED), Rapallo, Italy, July 2000, pp. 9-14.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Academic Journal of Science and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








