The Application and Development of 3D Printing in the Manufacturing of Robot End Effectors

Jiale Wang

doi:10.54097/966d7t34

Authors

Jiale Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/966d7t34

Keywords:

3D printing technology, end effectors, flexible robotic hands.

Abstract

With the development of intelligent manufacturing and robotics, end effectors, as the core components of robotics, are gradually attracting attention in terms of their performance and manufacturing methods. 3D printing technology, with its advantages of high customization and high efficiency, provides a new solution for structural innovation in robot end effectors. This paper reviews the current research achievements and progress of 3D printing technology in end effectors, especially in flexible robotic hands, and focuses on analyzing the achievements of several existing end effector designs. At the same time, this paper also points out in detail the shortcomings of current mainstream printing processes, as well as issues and challenges in process optimization and material performance. Finally, summarize existing research and propose future development directions, such as high-performance material research and development, AI-assisted modeling, etc. This paper aims to summarize existing developments and provide theoretical references for cross-disciplinary integration between 3D printing technology and robotics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Blanco, K., Navas, E., Emmi, L., & Fernandez, R. (2024). Manufacturing of 3D printed soft grippers: A review.

[2] Zhou, H., Tawk, C., & Alici, G. (2022). A 3D printed soft robotic hand with embedded soft sensors for direct transition between hand gestures and improved grasping quality and diversity.

[3] Netzev, M., Angleraud, A., & Pieters, R. (2020). Soft robotic gripper with compliant cell stacks for industrial part handling.

[4] Kim, D., Baek, S. R., Kim, M. S., Park, C. Y., & Lee, I. H. (2024). Design and manufacturing process of pneumatic soft gripper for additive manufacturing.

[5] Carta, M., Loi, G., El Mehtedi, M., Buonadonna, P., & Aymerich, F. (2025). Improving surface roughness of FDM-printed parts through CNC machining: A brief review.

[6] Palmer, J. H., Harper, J. D., & Marc, J. (2001). Control of brittleness in butyl-methylmethacrylate resin embedding mixtures to facilitate their use in immunofluorescence microscopy.

[7] Abbasi, M., Váz, P., Silva, J., & Martins, P. (2025). Head-to-head evaluation of FDM and SLA in additive manufacturing: Performance, cost, and environmental perspectives.

[8] de Sousa Filho, V. A., de Alencar Lira, M. C., & Bonfim, R. L. P. (2025). Reactive and non-reactive compatibilization of polyethylene terephthalate glycol/thermoplastic polyurethane (PETG/TPU) blends for 3D/4D printing applications.

[9] Zhou, R., Jiang, J., Li, P., Lu, S., Li, B., & Du, C. (2025). Optimized compound control strategy for high-speed 3D printing: Enhancing surface quality and printing precision.

[10] Heiss, A., Thatikonda, V. S., & Klotz, U. E. (2025). Multi-objective optimization of LPBF manufacturing with Zn-4Al-1Cu alloy for technical applications.

[11] Hassan, M., Misra, M., Taylor, G. W., & Mohanty, A. K. (2024). A review of AI for optimization of 3D printing of sustainable polymers and composites.

[12] Yang, W., Wang, L., Ma, G., & Feng, P. (2023). An integrated method of topological optimization and path design for 3D concrete printing.

[13] Du, G., & Qian, Y. (2024). Bio-inspired innovations in 3D concrete printing: Structures, materials and applications.