UAV-Based Target Search in Maze-Like Terrain

Authors

  • Guanyu Huang
  • Jiayin Wang
  • Haozhe Xu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/x12d3j48

Keywords:

UAV Path Planning, Search-and-Rescue (SAR), Real-time navigation.

Abstract

Owing to their being less expensive to operate, greater accessibility, and inherent ability to maneuver over tough terrain, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become an indispensable tool for rescue missions. However, in the cases where the missions require real-time decision-making without prior maps, existing approaches to UAV path planning still lack efficiency. The problem addressed in the paper is the design and assessment of a hybrid path planning algorithm for UAV-supported search and rescue operations adopted in maze-like, two-and-a-half-dimensional (2.5D) environments. We compared the classical algorithms, such as Random DFS, map-based, A-star, and D, with our suggested hybrid approach, which uses both the Frontier and Greedy algorithms, in Python-based simulations. Through this process, we achieved a total success rate (100%) across all algorithms, but we noticed profound differences in path efficiency, which required a lower time budget and computational resources among them. In particular, the hybrid advice had remarkable benefits over the baseline, such as 22% in Steps-to-Target, 46% in coverage speed, and more than 50% in Total Mission Steps. The only point is that the algorithm preserves its real-time feasibility and that the duration of each step is less than 50 ms. This study concludes that the UAV navigation strategy with hybridized frontier and greedy search is a promising and computationally efficient solution for time-critical SAR missions in maze-like environments, with a strong potential application in time-sensitive search and rescue responses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] LYV M, ZHAO Y, HUANG C, et al. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Search and Rescue: A Survey[J]. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15(13): 3266.

[2] SCHEDL D C, KURMI I, BIMBER O. An Autonomous Drone for Search and Rescue in Forests using Airborne Optical Sectioning[J]. arXiv preprint, 2021.

[3] ALLAN S, BARCZYK M. A Low-Cost Experimental Quadcopter Drone Design for Autonomous Search-and-Rescue Missions in GNSS-Denied Environments[J]. Drones, 2025, 9(8): 523.

[4] PAL B, PAUL S, TURUK A K, et al. UAV aided post disaster relief networks using blockchain technology: Challenges and solutions[C]//2024 Eighth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC). IEEE, 2024: 804-809.

[5] MENG W, ZHANG X, ZHOU L, et al. Advances in UAV path planning: A comprehensive review of methods, challenges, and future directions[J]. Drones, 2025, 9(5): 376.

[6] NASH A, DANIEL K, KOENIG S, et al. Theta*: Any-angle path planning on grids[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2007: 1177-1183.

[7] FERGUSON D, STENTZ A. Using interpolation to improve path planning: The Field D* algorithm[J]. Journal of Field Robotics, 2006, 23(2/3): 79-101.

[8] ZHANG W, YU W, ZHUANG L, et al. GO-FEAP: Global optimal UAV planner using frontier-omission-aware exploration and altitude-stratified planning[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.15931, 2023.

[9] ZHOU B, ZHANG Y, CHEN X, et al. FUEL: Fast UAV exploration using incremental frontier structure and hierarchical planning[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11561, 2020.

[10] ZHOU Y, YAN L, HAN Y, et al. HFCH: Hybrid frontier guided fast UAV autonomous exploration for complete and high-quality mapping in unknown environment[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2026, 69(Part A): 103834.

Downloads

Published

30-03-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Huang, G., Wang, J., & Xu, H. (2026). UAV-Based Target Search in Maze-Like Terrain. Academic Journal of Science and Technology, 20(2), 445-453. https://doi.org/10.54097/x12d3j48