Research Trends in Eco-Friendly Construction Materials (2015–2025): A Bibliometric Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/37aazb72Keywords:
Eco-friendly construction materials; green building materials; geopolymer; life-cycle assessment; bibliometric analysis; VOSviewer.Abstract
This study presents a bibliometric review of research on “eco-friendly construction materials” and “green building materials” published between 2015 and 2025. After a PRISMA screening process, 389 English-language journal articles and reviews identified via the Web of Science Core Collection were retrieved and analysed using VOSviewer [5]. The descriptive analysis indicates that the literature has increased significantly in recent years, with 86% of the corpus published since 2020 and 75% published in the last two years (2022–2023) (Table 1). China, the United States, India, Malaysia and Saudi Arabia are the top contributors to the literature (Table 1). Collaboration analysis of the 124 authors meeting the network threshold revealed only a few small, clearly defined research groups, most notably a group from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HKPU) focused on biochar- and sediment-based materials that can be used to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Keyword co-occurrence analysis (Figure 2) identified three interrelated clusters: an Alternative Materials and Mechanical–Durability Performance cluster (the largest, focused on compressive strength, geopolymer, fly ash, and microstructure), a Sustainability and Life-Cycle Assessment cluster, and a Circular Economy and Waste Valorization cluster (centred on the hub term “green building materials”). Temporal overlay analysis (Figure 3) shows that the research focus has shifted from the foundational themes of waste management and stabilization/solidification (2020–2021) toward valorisation of agricultural and industrial by-products, optimisation of mechanical properties, and the self-identification of “eco-friendly construction materials” as a distinct keyword in the most recent literature (2023–2025).
Downloads
References
[1] Zupic, I., Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472.
[2] White, H.D., McCain, K.W (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327–355.
[3] Det Udomsap, A., Hallinger, P. (2020). A bibliometric review of research on sustainable construction, 1994–2018. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120073.
[4] Shehata, N., Mohamed, O.A., Sayed, E.T., Abdelkareem, M.A., Olabi, A.G. (2022). Geopolymer concrete as green building materials: Recent applications, sustainable development and circular economy potentials. Science of the Total Environment, 836, 155577.
[5] Van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring Scholarly Impact (pp. 285–320). Springer.
[6] Ma, C.K., Awang, A.Z., Omar, W. (2018). Structural and material performance of geopolymer concrete: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 186, 90–102.
[7] Huang, G., Shi, Y., Zhou, Y., Li, H., Ye, P., Guo, B., et al., Wang, L. (2022). Biochar-augmented carbon-negative concrete. Chemical Engineering Journal, 431, 133946.
[8] Song, Q.F., Bu, Y.J., Chen, T. (2021). Use of steel slag as sustainable construction materials: A review of accelerated carbonation treatment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 173, 105740.
[9] Khoshnava, S.M., Rostami, R., Valipour, A., Ismail, M., Rahmat, A.R. (2018). Rank of green building material criteria based on the three pillars of sustainability using the hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173, 82–99.
[10] Sandanayake, M., Bouras, Y., Haigh, R., Vrcelj, Z. (2020). Sustainable criterion selection framework for green building materials — An optimisation-based study of fly-ash geopolymer concrete. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 25, e00178.
[11] Wang, L., Yeung, T.L.K., Lau, A.Y.T., Tsang, D.C.W., Poon, C.S. (2017). Recycling contaminated sediment into eco-friendly paving blocks by a combination of binary cement and carbon dioxide curing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 1279–1288.
[12] Wang, L, Tsang, D.C.W, Poon, C.S (2018). Recycling dredged sediment into fill materials, partition blocks, and paving blocks: Technical and economic assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 199, 69–76.
[13] Chen, L., Wang, L., Cho, D.W., Tsang, D.C.W., Tong, L., Zhou, Y., Yang, J., Hu, Q., Poon, C.S. (2019). The roles of biochar as green admixture for sediment-based construction products. Construction and Building Materials.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Academic Journal of Science and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








