Non-State Shareholder Participation and Technological Innovation in State-Owned Enterprises

Authors

  • Shuhong Huang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/1lrg2ojr

Keywords:

Non-State Shareholder Participation; Mixed Ownership Reform; Corporate Innovation.

Abstract

The Third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee established mixed ownership system as the main policy of SOE reform, and as the main form of SOE "mixed reform", can non-state shareholders' participation promote the technological innovation of SOE? Based on the research samples of China's A-share state-owned listed companies from 2010 to 2017, this paper finds that the participation of non-state shareholders promotes the technological innovation of SOE, and this result is more robust when the participation of non-state shareholders exceeds 10%, i.e., when the participation of non-state major shareholders is more robust. The results of the mediation effect model show that non-state shareholders' equity participation plays a positive role in the level of state-owned technological innovation by improving the incentive channel for executive compensation, while the results of the mediation effect test of the financial assets investment channel are not verified. This paper provides theoretical and empirical support for the rationality and effectiveness of mixed ownership reform from the dimension of technological innovation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fang Mingyue,Sun Kunpeng. Can mixed ownership of state-owned enterprises cure zombie enterprises? --A mixed ownership class pecking order logic[J]. Financial Research, 2019 (01): 91-110.

Yang Xingquan,Yin Xingqiang. How does the mixed reform of state-owned enterprises affect firms' cash holdings? [J]. Management World,2018,34(11):93-107.

YE Yongwei, LI Zengfu. State-owned enterprises' "mixed reform" and corporate financial asset allocation[J]. Financial Research, 2021(03):114-131.

YU Minggui, ZHONG Huijie, FAN Rui. Privatisation, financing constraints and corporate innovation - Evidence from Chinese industrial firms[J]. Financial Research,2019(04):75-91.

Li Wengui,Yu Minggui. Equity structure and corporate innovation in privatised firms[J]. Management World, 2015 (04): 112-125.

Li Wengui,Shao Yiping. Industrial policy and nationalisation of private enterprises[J]. Financial Research,2016(09):177-192.

Cai Guilong,Liu Jianhua,Ma Xinxiao. Governance of non-state shareholders and executive compensation incentives in state-owned enterprises[J]. Management World,2018,34(05):137-149.

Liu Yunguo,Zheng Qiao,Cai Guilong. Do non-state shareholders improve the internal control quality of state-owned enterprises? --Empirical evidence from state-owned listed companies! [J]. Accounting Research,2016(11):61-68+96.

Hao Yang,Gong Liutang. State-owned and private mixed equity participation and firm performance improvement[J]. Economic Research,2017,52(03):122-135.

LI Zengfu,HUANG Jiahui,LIAN Yujun. Non-state capital participation and technological innovation in state-owned enterprises[J]. Statistical Research,2021,38(01):119-131.

Hao Yunhong,Wang Xi. Research on Equity Check and Balance Mechanism of Mixed Ownership Enterprises--Based on the Case Analysis of "E-Wushang Control Dispute"[J]. China Industrial Economy,2015(03):148-160.

JIN Yuchao, JIN Qinglu, XUAN Yang. "Inaction" or "eagerness to perform":Political motives in corporate investment[J]. Economic Research,2016,51(10):126-139.

MA Lianfu,WANG Lili,ZHANG Qi. The preferential choice of mixed ownership system:the logic of market[J]. China industrial economy,2015(07):5-20.

Jiang Xuanyu. Government decentralisation and innovation of state-owned enterprises-A study based on the perspective of pyramid structure of local state-owned enterprises[J]. Management World,2016(09):120-135.

ZHU Bing,ZHANG Xiaoliang,ZHENG Xiaojia. Multiple large shareholders and corporate innovation[J]. Management World,2018,34(07):151-165.

JU Xiaosheng,LU Di,YU Yihua. Financing constraints, working capital management and corporate innovation sustainability[J]. Economic Research,2013,48(01):4-16.

PAN Yue,PAN Jianping,DAI Yiyi. Corporate Litigation Risk, Judicial Local Protectionism and Corporate Innovation[J]. Economic Research,2015,50(03):131-145.

Wen Zhonglin. Zhang Lei,Hou Jetai,Liu Hongyun. Mediation effect test procedure and its application[J]. Journal of Psychology, 2004(05): 614-620.

Aghion, P., John, V. R. and Luigi Z., 2013, "Innovation and Institutional Ownership", American Economic Review. Vol. 103(1), pp. 277~304.

Brandt, L. and H. Li, 2003, "Bank Discrimination in Transition Economies: Ideology, Information, or Incentives?," Journal of Comparative Economics, 31( 3), pp. 387 ~ 413.

Brown, J. R. , S. M. Fazzari and B. C. Petersen, 2009, "Financing Innovation and Growth: Cash Flow, External Equity, and the 1990s R&D Boom," Journal of Finance, 64( 1), pp. 151 ~ 185.

Hart, O., A. Shleifer and R. Vishny, 1997, "The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and an Application to Prisons," Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 112, pp. 1127~1161.

Hirshleifer, D., A. Low and S. H. Teoh, 2012, "Are Overconfident CEOs Better Innovators", Journal of Finance, Vol. 67, pp. . 1457~1498.

He J J, Tian X. The Dark Side of Analyst Coverage: the Case of Innovation [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2013, 109( 3) : 856 -878.

Laffont, J. - J. and J. Tirole, 1993, A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation, MIT press.

Sun, Q. and W. H. Tong, 2003, "China Share Issue Privatisation: The Extent of Its Success," Journal of Financial Economics, 70( 2), pp. 183 ~ 222.

Shleifer, A. and R. W. Vishny, 1994, "Politicians and Firms," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109( 4), pp. 995 ~ 1025.

Downloads

Published

16-01-2024

Issue

Section

Articles