A Brief Analysis of Good Argumentation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/vtf7gr91Keywords:
Good argumentation, Standard, Fallacy, Legal negotiationsAbstract
The book "Good Reasoning: Logical Training to Counter Fallacies" provides us with authoritative standards and paradigms for argumentation, as well as basic principles for the application of logical thinking, and deeply analyzes the difference between good argumentation and fallacies. This book aims to guide us in building good argumentative skills, enhancing our personal thinking and action skills, and enabling us to find a more advantageous position in both social and professional settings. In legal negotiations, good argumentation plays a crucial role.
Downloads
References
[1] Cai Guangchao Perelman's Theory of Argumentation and Its Rational View Research [D]. East China Normal University, 2018.
[2] Xie Yun. Argumentative Logic, Non Formal Logic, and Argumentative Theory [J]. Research on Dialectics of Nature, 2008, (03): 38-43.
[3] The BBC documentary uncovers the joy of logic for you. "www.sohu.com/a 349302823_371714. Date of visit: July 3, 2024.
[4] [American] T. Edward Dammer. Logic training to reason well and fight back against fallacies [M] Huang Lin, translated by Dao Erdeng Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, 2014.
[5] Ming Lan, Ce Liger. On Logical Argumentation [J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2006, (S1): 364-365.
[6] Xiong Minghui. Classification of fallacies based on argumentative evaluation [J]. Henan Social Sciences, 2013, 21 (05): 48-53.
[7] Ma Yongxia. General Norms and Error Analysis of Argumentation [J]. Journal of Yan'an University (Social Sciences Edition), 2004 (04): 5-9.
[8] Larry L. Teply, Legal Negotiation [M]. Beijing: China Law Press, 2005.
[9] Wang Yaling. A Brief Discussion on the Definition of Legal Negotiation [J]. Legal Expo, 2016, (07): 213+212.
[10] Pei Bei. Legal Negotiation: An Important Dispute Resolution Path in the Process of Building a Harmonious Society [J]. Ideological Front, 2007, (04): 90-94.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.