Data-driven urban Development Prospects Based Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/rwv9m728Keywords:
Sustainable Development, Smart City Technologies, Urban Resilience, Data-Driven Analysis, Housing Price PredictionAbstract
This study evaluates the future development prospects of Changchun and Hohhot through a data-driven approach, focusing on key factors such as housing prices, service levels, urban resilience, and sustainable development. The research integrates advanced modeling techniques including multiple linear regression, random forest, and XGBoost to analyze various urban indicators. In housing, the models identify price fluctuation factors and estimate housing stock using indirect metrics, with gradient boosting regression emerging as the most effective model. Changchun is found to excel in retail, finance, and lifestyle services, while Hohhot excels in public infrastructure, though both cities require balanced development to address disparities in facility distribution. Urban resilience is assessed by examining response capabilities to extreme weather and emergencies, with targeted investments suggested to enhance resilience and service accessibility. Sustainable development strategies for both cities are proposed, with Changchun focusing on green transportation and mixed-use developments, and Hohhot emphasizing healthcare and tourism infrastructure. Both cities are encouraged to adopt smart city technologies to optimize resource allocation. The study concludes that tailored development strategies, informed by data-driven insights, are crucial for achieving balanced, resilient, and sustainable urban growth, with practical recommendations for policymakers to improve service equity and foster long-term urban vitality.
Downloads
References
[1] Shi Y, Zhai G, Xu L, et al. Assessment methods of urban system resilience: From the perspective of complex adaptive system theory [J]. Cities, 2021, 112: 103141.
[2] Carvalhaes T M, Chester M V, Reddy A T, et al. An overview & synthesis of disaster resilience indices from a complexity perspective [J]. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 2021, 57: 102165.
[3] Xu H, Li Y, Tan Y, et al. A scientometric review of urban disaster resilience research [J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021, 18(7): 3677.
[4] Fu X, Hopton M E, Wang X. Assessment of green infrastructure performance through an urban resilience lens [J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2021, 289: 125146.
[5] Gillespie‐Marthaler L, Nelson K, Baroud H, et al. Selecting indicators for assessing community sustainable resilience [J]. Risk Analysis, 2019, 39(11): 2479-2498.
[6] Shamsipour A, Jahanshahi S, Mousavi S S, et al. Assessing and mapping urban ecological resilience using the loss-gain approach: A case study of Tehran, Iran [J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2024, 103: 105252.
[7] Makana L O, Jefferson I, Hunt D V L, et al. Assessment of the future resilience of sustainable urban sub-surface environments [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 21-31.
[8] Saikia P, Beane G, Garriga R G, et al. City Water Resilience Framework: A governance based planning tool to enhance urban water resilience [J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2022, 77: 103497.
[9] Index C R. City resilience framework [J]. The Rockefeller Foundation and ARUP, 2014, 928.
[10] Labaka L, Maraña P, Giménez R, et al. Defining the roadmap towards city resilience [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 146: 281-296.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







