Research on Optimizing Logistics and Distribution Paths Considering Carbon Emissions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/0p8p6553Keywords:
Path optimization, Carbon emission, Grey wolf algorithmAbstract
With the intensification of global climate change, reducing carbon emissions has become an urgent task for various industries. The logistics industry has high carbon emissions, and traditional path planning ignores environmental impacts. The current hot topic is to study the optimization of logistics paths that consider carbon emissions, in order to achieve a win-win situation for both the economy and the environment. This article aims to explore relevant theories and methods, propose solutions to reduce logistics carbon emissions, and promote sustainable development. Taking the optimization of logistics distribution paths in a certain enterprise as the research object, starting from the global background of energy conservation and emission reduction, this paper proposes to take the total cost (including time window penalty, transportation, carbon emissions, and fixed costs) as the optimization objective, construct a carbon emission logistics distribution path optimization model with time window, solve it using the improved grey wolf optimization algorithm, and compare it with the original plan. The results showed that after optimization, the cost was significantly reduced, verifying the effectiveness of the model, reducing delivery costs, and improving the economic benefits of the enterprise. Not only does it solve the problems of the enterprise, but it also provides reference for related industries.
Downloads
References
[1] Mazzarino M. The Economics of the Greenhouse Effect: Evaluating the Climate Change Impact due to the Transport Sector in Italy [J]. Energy Policy, 2000, 28(13):957-966.
[2] Friedl B, Getzner M. Determinants of CO2 Emissions in a Small Open Economy [J]. Ecological Economics, 2003, 45(1):133-148.
[3] Dagoumah A S, Barker T S. Patways to a Low-carbon Economy for the UK with the Macro- econometric E3MG Model [J]. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(6):3067-3077.
[4] Moghaddam B F, Ruiz R, Sadjadi S J. Vehicle Routing Problem with Uncertain Demands: An Advanced Particle Swarm Algorithm [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2012, 62(1): 306-317.
[5] Viktor Danchuk1; Olena Bakulich2; Vitaliy Svatko1. Building Optimal Routes for Car go Delivery in Megacities [J]. Transport and Telecommunication Journal. 2019, Vol.20 (No. 2):142-152.
[6] Qin, Gaoyuan1; Tao, Fengming1; Li, Lixia1; Chen, Zhenyu2. Optimization of the simultane ous pickup and delivery vehicle routing problem based on carbon tax [J]. Industrial Ma nagement & Data Systems. 2019, Vol.119 (No.9):2055-2071.
[7] Krishna Veer Tiwari; Satyendra Kumar Sharma. An Optimization Model for Vehicle Routing Problem in Last-mile Delivery [J]. Expert Systems with Applications. 2023:119789.
[8] Fatimah Mohamad Ayop S, Shahizan Othman M, Yusuf L M. Ant Colony Optimization Using Different Heuristic Strategies for Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem[C]//Materials Science and Engineering Conference Series. 2020, 864(1): 012082.
[9] Ricke K, Drouet L, Caldeira K, et al. Country-level social cost of carbon [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8(10):895-900.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







