The Dilemma and Countermeasures of The Value Chain of China's Semiconductor Industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/b9sj0r13Keywords:
Semiconductor industry, Value chain, Global supply chainAbstract
Semiconductors are the core components of the digital economy, the hub of all digital products and future technologies, and the basic technical support for defense, communications, big data, artificial intelligence (AI) and other industries. As the most thorough and comprehensive industry in globalization, the semiconductor industry contains all the attributes and elements in the global value chain. The close division and cooperation of its global industrial chain is a typical case of the global specialization cooperation division mode. This paper systematically examines the dilemma of China's semiconductor value chain, and puts forward specific policy suggestions for China. China should further promote the transformation of technology application achievements, smooth the domestic and international trade cycle, and expand international semiconductor coordination and cooperation, to enhance the competitiveness of its semiconductor industry and gradually enhance the toughness of the supply chain of the semiconductor industry.
Downloads
References
[1] Huang Ye-jing, Sun Mei-lu, Dou qian-bin. Cross-board Supply Chain risk of IC industry under Perspective of Trade Networks Analysis, Asia-pacific Economic Review [J], 2022, 3:119.
[2] Milberg,W.,D. Winkler. “Trade Crisis and Recovery-Restructuring of Global Value Chains”, Policy Research Working Paper [J], No 5294, The World Bank, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5294
[3] Sheng Bin, Chenxin Jin, “The Evaluation of RCEP Agreement: Market Access and Trading Rules”, China & World Economy, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 49–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12437
[4] Tang Yihong, Zhang Pengyang, Enhancing the Controlling Capability of the Industrial Chain and Supply Chain Transfer——Research on the Transfer of China’s Manufacturing Industry Chain, China Opening Journal [J], 2022, 4:7.
[5] Li Wei, Li Yuyi, Decoding the U.S. Hegemony in the Semiconductor Industry: Conceptualizing the Political Economy of Industrial Power, Foreign Affairs Review [J], 2022, 39(01):22.
[6] White G F., Natural Hazards, Local, National, Global, London: Oxford University Press, 1974, p.33.
[7] Wang ling, Zhu Zheyuan, Literature Review on Vulnerability in Supply Chain, Soft Science [J], 2011, 25(09):136.
[8] Svensson G., “A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of Vulnerability in Supply Chain”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 2000, 30(9): 731-749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030010351444
[9] Christopher M., “Managing Risk in the Supply Chain”, Logistics & Supply Chain Management, Prentice-Hall, 2005.
[10] Henry Farrell, Abraham L. Newman, “Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion”, International Security, Vol.44, No.1, 2019, pp.42-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351
[11] Xue Lan, Wei Shaojun, Li Yan, He Jun, Luo Changyuan, Yu Zhen, Yang Rongzhen, The CHIPS and Science Act of US and Analysis of Its Impacts, International Economic Review [J], 2022(06):9.
[12] Zhi Wang et al., “Re-examining the Effects of Trading with China on Local Labor Markets: A Supply Chain Perspective”, NBER Working Paper no.24886, August 2018, revised on October 2018, https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w24886/w24886.pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w24886
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
