Measurement and Optimization Strategy of Urban Environmental Governance Efficiency in Different Provinces of China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v3i3.336Keywords:
Urban Environment, Environmental Governance, Efficiency Measurement, DEA, Environmental EconomyAbstract
The urban environment has certain attributes of public products, and its governance activities are often led by the government. Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, China has actively promoted the coordination of resources and the environment, steadily promoted the construction of socialist ecological civilization, and sought breakthroughs in urban environmental governance methods, governance scopes, and governance concepts. Studying the level and efficiency of urban environmental governance in different regions is conducive to the realization of coordinated urban and rural development and the improvement of regional comprehensive environmental conditions. This paper uses data envelopment analysis to measure the urban environmental governance efficiency of 31 provinces in China in 2019, and quantitatively analyze and compare comprehensive technical efficiency score, pure technical efficiency score, scale efficiency score, and return to scale. It is found that (1) the urban development in various regions is unbalanced, and the efficiency of environmental governance varies greatly; (2) the overall efficiency of urban environmental governance in Jilin, Liaoning, Ningxia, and Tibet is relatively good. The pure technical efficiency score of urban environmental governance in Guangdong, Hunan, and Shandong performed relatively well; The economies of scale in Guizhou, Hainan and Qinghai are relatively obvious, and the growth level of urban environmental governance output factors is higher than that of input factors. China should refine the investment direction of environmental governance, introduce advanced environmental governance technologies, explore comprehensive governance models involving all citizens, and formulate environmental governance plans that meet the actual conditions of the city, so as to improve the efficiency of urban environmental governance, optimize the level of urban environmental governance, and realize the sustainable development of economy, resources and environment.
Downloads
References
Brondizio E S , Le Tourneau F M . ENVIRONMENT. Environmental governance for all[J]. Science, 2016, 352(6291):1272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf5122
Adam A , Tsarsitalidou S . Environmental policy efficiency: measurement and determinants[J]. Economics of Governance, 2019, 20(1):1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-018-0219-y
Zhu N , Zhao Q , Tian L , et al. Cost Analysis and Development Strategies for China' Natural Gas Power Generation Industry Under the Situation of Energy Price's Reformation[J]. Energy Procedia, 2016, 104:203-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.12.035
A, Charnes, and, et al. Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(79)90229-7
Banker R D , Charnes A , Cooper W W . Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis[J]. Management Science, 1984, 30(9):1078-1092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
Stefan, Brehm, Jesper, et al. Environmental governance with Chinese characteristics: are environmental model cities a good example for other municipalities?[J]. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 2020, 4(1):111-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-019-00135-6
Zhu N P , Zhao Q , Shen Y . Cost Analysis of Carbon Emission Based on Carbon Finance[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2015, 1065-1069:3030-3034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1065-1069.3030
Besede T , Johnson E P , Tian X . Economic determinants of multilateral environmental agreements[J]. International Tax and Public Finance, 2020, 27(4):832-864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-019-09588-z
Garrido-Prada P , Lenihan H , Doran J , et al. Driving the circular economy through public environmental and energy R&D: Evidence from SMEs in the European Union[J]. Ecological Economics, 2020(4):106884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106884
Chodakowska E , Nazarko J . Environmental DEA method for assessing productivity of European countries[J]. Technological & Economic Development of Economy, 2017, 23(4):589-607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2016.1272069








