The Effect of the Independence, Expertise and Activity of the Audit Committee On the Quality of the Financial Reporting Process

Authors

  • Huiyi Leng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v7i1.3688

Keywords:

Corporate Governance, Audit Committee Characteristics, Financial Reporting Process Quality.

Abstract

This paper critically assesses the importance and impact of 3 main characteristics of audit committee independence, expertise and activity on the overall effectiveness of audit committees and the quality of the financial reporting process, based on corporate governance and regulatory debates and relevant research evidence, combined with statistics and analysis of data relating to these characteristics of audit committees of significant international companies. The results found that audit committee independence plays an important, but questionable, role in the monitoring of financial information, disclosure of internal controls and the company's financial reporting process. Secondly, the expertise of audit committee professionals can enhance the quality of financial reporting. Finally, a diligent audit committee can, to some extent, improve the level of oversight of the financial reporting process of the activity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abbott, L., Park, Y. and Parker, S., (2000). ‘The effects of audit committee activity and independence on corporate fraud’, Managerial Finance 26 (11), pp. 55-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350010766990

Abbott, L., Parker S., Peters G. and Raghunandan K., (2003). ‘The Association between Audit Committee Characteristics and Audit Fees.’ Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22 (2), pp. 17–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2003.22.2.17

Adams, B. and Ferreira, D., (2007). A theory of friendly boards. The Journal of Finance, 62(1), pp.217-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01206.x

Agrawal, A. and Sahiba, C., (2005). Corporate governance and accounting scandals, Journal of Law and Economics, Forthcoming. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/430808

Beasley, M., (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud, The Accounting Review 71 (4), pp. 443-465.

Beasley, M., Carcello, V., Hermanson, R. and Lapides, D., (2000). ‘Fraudulent financial reporting: consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms’, Accounting Horizons, 14 (4), pp. 441-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2000.14.4.441

Beasley, M., Carcello, J., Hermanson, D., and Neal, T., (2009). The audit committee oversight process. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26, pp. 65-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1506/car.26.1.3

Bedard, J., Chtourou, S. M. & Courteau, L., (2004). ‘The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (2), pp. 13–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2004.23.2.13

Bradbury, M., Mak, Y. and Tan, S., (2006). ‘Board Characteristics, Audit Committee Characteristics and Abnormal Accruals’, Pacific Accounting Review, 18 (2), pp. 47-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01140580610732813

Burke, M.; and Guy M., (2001). Audit committees: A guide for directors, management, and consultants. New York: Aspen Law & Business.

Carcello, J., Neal, T., (2000). Audit committee composition and auditor reporting. The Accounting Review 75 (4), 453–467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2000.75.4.453

Carcello, J., Hollingsworth, W., and Neal, L., (2006). Audit committee financial experts: A closer examination using firm designations. Accounting Horizons, 20 (4), 351 – 373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2006.20.4.351

Carcello, J., (2009). ‘Governance and the Common Good.’ Journal of Business Ethics 89, pp. 11–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9904-z

Cohen, J., Hoitash, U., Krishnamoorthy, G. and Wright, A., (2013). Audit committee industry expertise and financial reporting quality. Working paper. Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.

Collier, P., & Gregory, A., (1996). Audit committee effectiveness and the audit fee. European Accounting Review, 5, 177-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638189600000012

Collier, P. and Gregory, A., (1999). ‘Audit committee activity and agency costs’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 18 (4/5), pp. 311-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(99)00015-0

DeFond, M., Hann, R. and Hu, X., (2005). Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of boards of directors. Journal of Accounting Research 43 (2), 153–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2005.00166.x

DeZoort, F. and Salterio, S., (2001). The effects of corporate governance experience and financial reporting and audit knowledge on audit committee members’ judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 20 (2), pp. 31–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2001.20.2.31

DeZoort, F., Hermanson D., Archambeault D. and Reed S., (2002). ‘Audit Committee Effectiveness: A Synthesis of the Empirical Audit Committee Literature.’ Journal of Accounting Literature 21, pp. 38–75.

Dhaliwal, D., Naiker, V., and Navissi, S., (2010). The association between accruals quality and the characteristics of accounting experts and mix of expertise on audit committees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27, 787 – 827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01027.x

Dionne, G. and Triki, T., (2005). Risk Management and Corporate Governance: The Importance of Independence and Financial Knowledge for the Board and the Audit Committee. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.686470

Fama, E., (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88, pp. 134-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260866

Fama, E. and Jensen, M., (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, pp. 301-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/467037

Ferreira, D., Ferreira, A., and Raposo, C., (2011). Board structure and price informativeness. Journal of Financial Economics, 99 (3), 523-545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.10.007

Ghafran, C. and Yasmin, S., (2018). 'Audit committee chair and financial reporting timeliness: a focus on financial, experiential and monitoring experiense.', International journal of auditing., 22 (1). pp.13-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12101

Goodwin, J., (2003). ‘The relationship between the audit committee and the internal audit function: Evidence from Australia and New Zealand’, International Journal of Auditing, 7 (3), pp. 263–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1099-1123.2003.00074.x

Goodwin, J. and Kent, P., (2006). ‘Relation between External Audit Fees, Audit Committee Characteristics and Internal Audit.’ Accounting and Finance 46 (4), pp. 387–404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2006.00174.x

Haniffa, R., Yatim, P., Kent, P., and Clarkson, P., (2006). Governance structures, ethnicity, and audit fees of Malaysian listed firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21 (7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900610680530

Klein, A., (2002). ‘Audit Committee, Board of Director Characteristics, and Earnings Management.’ Journal of Accounting and Economics 33, pp. 375–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00059-9

Krishnan, J., (2005). Audit committee financial expertise and internal control: an empirical analysis. The Accounting Review 80 (2), pp. 649–675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.2.649

Krishnan, G. and Visvanathan, G., (2007). ‘Reporting internal control deficiencies in the post-Sarbanes-Oxley era: The role of auditors and corporate governance’, International Journal of Auditing, 11 (2), pp. 73–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2007.00358.x

Krishnan, G. & Visvanathan, G., (2008). Does the SOX definition of an accounting expert matter? The association between audit committee directors’ accounting expertise and accounting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25, pp. 827 – 857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.3.7

Marra, A., Mazzola P., and Prencipe A., (2011). ‘Board Monitoring and Earnings Management Pre- and Post IFRS.’ The International Journal of Accounting 46, pp. 205–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2011.04.007

McDaniel, L., Marint, R. and Maines, L. A., (2002). ‘Evaluating financial report quality: The effects of financial expertise vs. financial literacy’, The Accounting Review, 77, Supplement, pp. 139–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.139

McMullen, D. and Raghunandan, K., (1996). ‘Enhancing audit committee effectiveness’, Journal of Accountancy, 182 (2), pp. 79–81.

O'Sullivan, N., (2000). The impact of board composition and ownership on audit quality: Evidence from large UK companies. The British Accounting Review, 32, 397-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.2000.0139

Pomeroy, B., and Thornton, B., (2008). Meta-analysis and the accounting literature: The case of audit committee independence and financial reporting quality. European Accounting Review, 17, pp. 305-330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180701819832

Raghunandan, K., Read, W. and Rama, D., (2001). Audit committee composition, “gray directors,”and interaction with internal auditing. Accounting Horizons 15 (2), pp. 105–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2001.15.2.105

Raghunandan, K., and Rama D., (2007). ‘Determinants of Audit Committee Diligence.’ Accounting Horizons 21 (3), pp. 265–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2007.21.3.265

Scarbrough, D., Rama, D. and Raghunandan, K., (1998). Audit committee composition and interaction with internal auditing: Canadian evidence. Accounting Horizons 12 (1), pp. 51–62.

Sharma, V., Naiker V. and Lee B., (2009). ‘Determinants of Audit Committee Meeting Frequency: Evidence from a Voluntary Governance System.’ Accounting Horizons 23 (3), pp. 245–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2009.23.3.245

Spira, L., (1999). Independence in Corporate Governance: the Audit Committee Role. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8, pp. 262-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8608.00160

Sultana, N., Singh, H. and Van der Zahn, J.-L.W.M., (2015). Audit Committee Characteristics and Audit Report Lag. International Journal of Auditing, 19, pp. 72-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12033

Vafeas, N., (1999). ‘Board meeting frequency and firm performance’, Journal of Financial Economics, 53 (1), pp. 113–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00018-5

Xie, B., Wallace D., and Peter D., (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee, Journal of Corporate Finance, 9 (3), pp. 295– 316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(02)00006-8

Zaman, M., Hudaib M. and Haniffa R., (2011). ‘Corporate Governance Quality, Audit Fees and Non-Audit Services Fees.’ Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 38 (1–2), pp. 165–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2010.02224.x

Zhang, Y., Zhou, J. and Zhou, N., (2007). Audit committee quality, auditor independence, and internal control weaknesses, Journal of accounting and public policy, 26(3), pp. 300-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2007.03.001

Downloads

Published

20-12-2022

How to Cite

Leng, H. (2022). The Effect of the Independence, Expertise and Activity of the Audit Committee On the Quality of the Financial Reporting Process. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 7(1), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v7i1.3688

Issue

Section

Articles