Illusion or Persuasion: A Study on the Factuality of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) Content and Rhetorical Communication Effects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/10fqm603Keywords:
Generative Artificial Intelligence, Rhetorical Style, Controlled ExperimentsAbstract
(GAI)to investigate the role of rhetorical expressions on the trust of the public towards GAI-generated content, this paper utilizes control-group experiments. It is shown that intemperate rhetorical expressions in GAI-generated content are conducive to increasing the public’s perception of trust towards it and increasing the likelihood of information sharing. At the same time, these intemperate rhetorical expressions can help to ease the credibility crisis caused by inaccuracies contained in the GAI-generated information to a certain extent, especially toward low-competent groups in terms of media literacy. In this way, GAI hallucinations cannot be just seen as a technological error; they are also a communicative effect, and such findings offer empirical evidence and actionable ways of how to counter the misleading mechanisms of AIGC and governance measures.
Downloads
References
[1] Kim J, Lee J, Jang K M, [1] Kim J, Lee J, Jang K M, et al. Exploring the Limitations in How ChatGPT Introduces Environmental Justice Issues in the United States: A Case Study of 3, 108 Counties[J]. Telematics and Informatics, 2024, 86: 102085.
[2] Wang Xiwei, Wu Yanting, Li Yueqi. The Information Fog Driven by Social Robots: Communication Mechanisms, Social Risks, and Governance Pathways [J]. Information Theory and Practice, 2025,48(3):41-51.
[3] Zheng Xu. (2025). Technology Empowerment: Opportunities and Challenges of GAI in Converged News Reporting. Media, (11),26-29.https://doi.org/ CNKI:SUN: CMEI. 0.2025-11-009.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Art and Design

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

