Resistance as Belatedness: The Mechanism of Assimilation in Rhinoceros
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/dh754f76Keywords:
Eugène Ionesco, Theatre of the Absurd, Rhinoceros, ResistanceAbstract
Eugène Ionesco’s Rhinoceros is commonly regarded as an allegorical critique of fascism and collective assimilation. Yet in the play, those who first undergo “rhinocerization” are characters who pride themselves on rationality and emphasize logic and order, while the indolent and hesitant Bérenger remains the only figure who resists assimilation. Grounded in Ionesco’s anti-fascist position, this article reexamines the differentiation of forms of rationality within the play and argues that the mechanism of assimilation operates through the appropriation of formalized rational discourse that has lost its capacity for judgment. Bérenger’s resistance is not heroic in nature; rather, it takes the form of a belated stance that remains out of sync with the rhythm of assimilation.
Downloads
References
[1] Huang, J.K. (2005) The Tragicomic of Mutation. Foreign Literature Review, 3: 42–49.
[2] Esslin, M. (1961) The Theatre of the Absurd. Anchor Books, New York.
[3] Xue, L. (2008) On the Philosophical Reflection on Humanity in Rhinoceros. Journal of North University of China (Social Science Edition), S1: 94–95.
[4] Arendt,H.(1971) Thinking and Moral Considerations, Social Research 38:417-446.
[5] Kang, X.Y., Zhao, X.H. (2010) Rhinoceros: The Loss and Reconstruction of Human Subjectivity. Journal of Sichuan Minzu College, 19: 53–56.
[6] Ionesco, E. (1964) Notes and Counter Notes. Grove Press, New York.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Highlights in Art and Design

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

