ED50 and ED95 of Nalbuphine Combined with Ciprofol in Laryngeal Mask Insertion Responses in Day-Patient Hysteroscopic Surgery

Authors

  • Haicheng Liu
  • Qifei Li
  • Yi Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/6t8h5c29

Keywords:

Nalbuphine, Ciprofol, ED50, Laryngeal Mask, ED95

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine the effective dose (ED50 and ED95) of ciprofol combined with nalbuphine in inhibiting laryngeal mask insertion responses in day-patients hysteroscopic surgery using a sequential method. Methods: Patients undergoing general anesthesia hysteroscopic in a daytime surgery center were selected. The age of patients ranged from 18 to 60 years, BMI ranged from 18.0 to 28.0 kg/m 2, and ASA classification ranged from gradeⅠto gradeⅡ. Nalbuphine was administered via slow intravenous injection at an initial dose of 0.16 mg/kg, followed by intravenous administration of 0.4 mg/kg ciprofol. The laryngeal mask was inserted when the patient’s eyelash reflex disappeared and the Narcotrend index reached between 50 and 60. A sequential method was employed to establish the nalbuphine dosage: if a positive response occurred during laryngeal mask insertion, the next patient received a dose one gradient higher; conversely, if no response was observed, a lower dose one gradient down was chosen, with adjacent dose differences of 0.01 mg/kg. The ED50 and ED95 of ciprofol combined with nalbuphine for inhibiting laryngeal mask insertion responses were calculated along with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The ED50 value of nalbuphine for inhibiting laryngeal mask insertion responses was found to be 0.149 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.142–0.155 mg/kg), while the ED95 value was determined to be 0.160 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.154–0.191 mg/kg).Conclusion: When combined with ciprofol, the ED50 of nalbuphine for inhibiting laryngeal mask insertion responses in patients undergoing outpatient hysteroscopic surgery is established at 0.149 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.142–0.155 mg/kg), and the ED95 is set at 0.160 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.154–0.191 mg/kg).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Harrison R,Kuteesa W,Kapila A,et al. Pain-free day surgery? Evaluating pain and pain assessment during hysteroscopy[J]. British Journal of Anaesthesia,2020,125(6):e468-e470.

[2] Sadafule NN,Karhade SS. Comparative study of efficacy of preoperative nalbuphine hydrochloride and pentazocine lactate on hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation and postoperative analgesia. Anesth Essays Res[J]. 2018,12(1): 218-222.

[3] WANG Defa;ZHENG Huili;LIU Pingping;GUO Jianlian;MA Baoxin. Median effective dose of nalbuphine that inhibits the response of laryngeal mask in hysteroscopic surgery [J]. Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology,2021, 06:562-569.

[4] Ciebiera M, Łoziński T,Wojtyła C,et al. Complications in modern hysteroscopic myomectomy[J]. Ginekologia Polska, 2018,89(7):398-404.

[5] Salazar CA, Isaacson KB. Office operative hysteroscopy: an update[J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2018, 25 (2):199-208.

[6] MA Zheng-liang;HUANG Yu-guang,et al. Expert Consensus on Anesthesia Management of Enhanced Recovery after Adult Ambulatory Surgery [J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital,2019,06:562-569.

[7] QIN L,REN L,WAN S,et al. Design,Synthesis,and evaluation of novel 2,6- disubstituted phenol derivatives as general anesthetics [J]. J Med Chem,2017,60(9):3606-3617.

[8] YIN Xinyu, LIU Jinhui, YUAN Biying,et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Ciprofol for General Anesthesia Induction of Gynecological Day Surgery [J]. China Pharmaceuticals, 2023, 05:101-104.

[9] Gress K,Charipova K,Jung JW,et al. A comprehensive review of partial opioid agonists for the treatment of chronic pain [J]. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 2020, 34 (3): 449-461.

[10] Akshat S,Ramachandran R,Rewari V,et al. Morphine versus nalbuphine for open gynaecological surgery: a randomized controlled double blinded trial[J]. Pain research and treatment, 2014,2014:727952.

[11] Gear RW,Gordon NC,Miaskowski,et al.Sexual dimorphism in very low dose nalbuphine postoperatibe analgesia[J]. Neuroscience letters,2003,339(1):1-4.

[12] Meng YX,Si SL,Chao Z,et al. Nalbuphine for analgesia after orthognathic surgery and its effect on postoperative inflammatory and oxidative stress: a randomized double-blind controlled trial[J]. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2020,78( 4):528-537.

[13] Bi Xiaobao, Wang Qiong, Zhang Gaolong, et al. Effects of nalbuphine and sufentanil for hysteroscopy:a comparative study [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2018, 34 (18):3085-3088.

[14] Zeng Z,Lu JH,Shu C,et al. A comparision of nalbuphine with morphine for analgesic effects and safety: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Scientific Reports,2015, 5: 10927.

[15] Mitchell M. Home recovery following day surgery: a patient perspective[J]. Journal of Clinical Nursing,2015,24(3-4): 415-427.

[16] Larsen D,Maani CV. Nalbuphine. In:StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL):StatPearls Publishing; May 1,2023.

Downloads

Published

29-12-2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Liu, H., Li, Q., & Chen, Y. (2024). ED50 and ED95 of Nalbuphine Combined with Ciprofol in Laryngeal Mask Insertion Responses in Day-Patient Hysteroscopic Surgery. International Journal of Biology and Life Sciences, 8(3), 11-15. https://doi.org/10.54097/6t8h5c29