Bioinformatics Analysis of the Mechanisms by Which NAGLU Regulates Glioblastoma Cell Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/rawvam60Keywords:
N-acetyl-α-glucosaminidase, Cell Development, Glioblastoma, BioinformaticsAbstract
To investigate the expression of N-acetyl-α-glucosaminidase (NAGLU) in glioblastoma (GBM) and to understand its relationship with disease progression and prognosis, we screened for differentially expressed genes in GBM progression using the QuickGO and GEPIA 2 online databases and identified the target gene NAGLU. Further analysis was conducted using bioinformatics tools, including the STRING, TIMER 2.0, and UALCAN databases, to analyze the differential expression of NAGLU across various cancer types and its correlation with GBM progression, as well as to predict its association with prognosis. We used the miRNet database to analyze its target miRNAs and lncRNAs and employed Cytoscape v3.10.0 to visualize the potential ceRNA regulatory network. The results showed that 144 genes related to cell developmental processes were retrieved from online databases. Additionally, 7,648 genes were differentially expressed in GBM. Sixty-two differentially expressed genes were involved in the biological processes of GBM cell senescence. Among them, NAGLU was significantly overexpressed in multiple cancers, including GBM, and high NAGLU expression was statistically associated with a significantly worse prognosis in GBM patients. The NAGLU gene encodes 10 interacting proteins, primarily involved in 3 signaling pathways (KEGG), 3 molecular functions (MF), 12 cellular components (CC), and 6 biological processes (BP). We predicted 1 miRNA and 44 lncRNAs targeting NAGLU. The study results indicate that NAGLU is highly expressed in various tumors, including GBM. Its expression also showed significant differences based on patient gender, age, ethnicity, and TP53 mutation status. In GBM progression, NAGLU may function via the lncRNA/miR-1-3p/NAGLU axis, serving as both a prognostic marker and a potential therapeutic target.
Downloads
References
[1] Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways[J]. Nature, 2008, 455(7216): 1061-1068.
[2] Duan S, Yuan G, Liu X, et al. PTEN deficiency reprogrammes human neural stem cells towards a glioblastoma stem cell-like phenotype[J]. Nat Commun, 2015, 6: 10068.
[3] Furnari FB, Fenton T, Bachoo RM, et al. Malignant astrocytic glioma: genetics, biology, and paths to treatment[J]. Genes Dev, 2014, 21(21): 2683-2710.
[4] SENGA S S,GROSE R P.Hallmarks of cancer -the new testament [J].Open Biol ,2021,11(1):200358.
[5] LAH T T,NOVAK M,BREZNIK B.Brain malignancies: Glioblastoma and brain metastases[J].Semin Cancer Biol, 2020, 60: 262-273.
[6] Keilani S, Lun Y, Stevens AC, et al. Lysosomal dysfunction in a mouse model of Sandhoff disease leads to accumulation of ganglioside-bound amyloid-beta peptide[J].J Neurosci, 2012, 32 (15):5223-5236.
[7] Rouse CJ, Jensen VN, Heldermon CD. Mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIB: a current review and exploration of the AAV therapy landscape[J].Neural Regen Res 2024, 19(2):355-359.
[8] Winder-Rhodes SE, Garcia-Reitbock P, Ban M, Evans JR, Jacques TS, Kemppinen A, Foltynie T, Williams-Gray CH, Chinnery PF, Hudson G, Burn DJ, Allcock LM, Sawcer SJ, Barker RA, et al. Genetic and pathological links between Parkinson’s disease and the lysosomal disorder Sanfilippo syndrome[J]. Mov Disord 2012, 27(2):312-315.
[9] Bae EJ, Lee HJ, Jang YH, et al.Phospholipase D1 regulates autophagic flux and clearance of alpha-synuclein aggregates. Cell Death Differ. 2014, 21(7):1132–1141.
[10] Lefranc F, Kiss R. Autophagy, the Trojan horse to combat glioblastomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2006,20(4): E7.
[11] Ostrom QT, Bauchet L, Davis FG, et al.The epidemiology of glioma in adults: a "state of the science" review[J].Neuro Oncol. 2014 ,16(7):896-913.
[12] DAVIS M E.Glioblastoma :Overview of disease and treatment [J].Clin J Oncol Nurs, 2016,20(5Suppl ):2-8.
[13] FRIEDMANN-MORVINSKI D. Glioblastoma heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity[J].Crit Rev Oncog ,2014,19(5):327-336.
[14] LAH T T,NOVAK M,BREZNIK B. Brain malignancies :Glio⁃ blastoma and brain metastases[J].Semin Cancer Biol ,2020,60: 262-273.
[15] CAMPOS B,OLSEN L R,URUP T, et al. A Comprehensive pro-file of recurrent glioblastoma[J].Oncogene ,2016,35(45): 5819-5825.
[16] HUTÓCZKI G,VIRGA J,BIRKÓ Z,et al. Novel Concepts of glioblastoma therapy concerning its heterogeneity[J].Int J Mol Sci, 2021,22(18):10005.
[17] LE RHUN E,PREUSSER M,ROTH P, et al. Molecular targeted therapy of glioblastoma[J].Cancer Treat Rev, 2019, 80: 101896.
[18] DAUBON T,HEMADOU A,ROMERO GARMENDIA I,et al. Glioblastoma Immune landscape and the potential of new immuno⁃ therapies[J]. Front Immunol ,2020,11:585616.
[19] RIVERA M,BANDER E D,CISSE B. Perspectives on Microg-lia-Based Immune Therapies Against Glioblastoma[J].World Neurosurg,2021,154:228-231.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.