Research on the Clinical Advances in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty

Hao Deng

doi:10.54097/azfj1a84

Authors

Hao Deng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/azfj1a84

Keywords:

Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty, Total Hip Arthroplasty, Metal Ions, Prosthesis Design, Revision Surgery

Abstract

Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (HRA), as a significant advancement in modern arthroplasty, has demonstrated considerable value in treating hip diseases in young and highly active patients due to its unique bone-conserving characteristics. Compared to traditional Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA), HRA offers distinct advantages in preserving femoral bone stock, maintaining physiological biomechanical structure, and facilitating the recovery of high-level physical function postoperatively. However, metal ion release and associated complications caused by metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing surfaces remain major constraints on its clinical application. This article systematically reviews the technical features, evolving indications, clinical outcomes, complication management strategies, and future directions of HRA. It focuses on its clinical value in specific patient populations and emphasizes the critical role of strict adherence to surgical indications, meticulous surgical technique, and systematic postoperative follow-up in ensuring long-term efficacy. By comprehensively analyzing the existing literature evidence, it aims to provide theoretical basis and technical reference for clinical practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Fan Zhirong, Huang Yongquan, Peng Jiajie, et al. Efficacy and Metal Ion Levels of Birmingham Hip Surface Replacement Compared with Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering, 2020, 24 (03): 428-437.

[2] Niu Wenjie, Zhou Xin, Yang Yanfei, et al. Meta-analysis of the Efficacy Differences Between Hip Surface Arthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty in Middle-Aged Patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopedics and Rehabilitation (Electronic Edition), 2021, 7 (05): 304-313.

[3] Zhang Xinxiong. Clinical Comparison of Total Hip Arthroplasty and Total Hip Surface Replacement in Patients with Secondary Traumatic Arthritis Following Acetabular Fracture [J]. Journal of Practical Hospital Clinical Medicine, 2019, 16 (03): 171-173.

[4] Liu Xingsheng, Liu Fan. Key Considerations in Hip Surface Replacement Surgery [J]. Jiangsu Medicine, 2019, 45 (05): 510-515.

[5] Wan Yanlin, You Jia, Jiang Wenxue, et al. Follow-up Study on Metal Ion Levels After Hip Surface Arthroplasty [J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery (Electronic Edition), 2021, 15 (06): 660-665.

[6] Zhang Liqiang, Liao Tao, Huang Wei, et al. Outcomes of Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Failed Hip Surface Arthroplasty [J]. Journal of Practical Orthopaedics, 2019, 25 (02): 163-166.

[7] Yuan Yuzhen. Numerical Analysis and Structural Optimization of Hip Surface Replacement Prostheses [D]. Tianjin University of Technology, 2025.

[8] Ma Tao, Zhang Yumin, Hao Linjie, et al. Advances in Total Hip Arthroplasty Research [J]. Journal of Shaanxi Medicine, 2019, 48 (05): 675-678.

[9] Chen Ning, Li Zhun. Application Value of Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Traumatic Osteoarthritis of the Hip [J]. World Journal of Integrated Medicine, 2020, 6 (05): 32-34.

[10] Peter,Grigoris, Paul,Roberts, et al. The evolution of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. The Orthopedic clinics of North America, 2005,36(2): 125-134.

[11] Amanatullah D F, Cheung Y, Di Cesare P E. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of the evidence for surgical technique, outcome, and complications[J]. Orthopedic Clinics, 2010, 41(2): 263-272.

[12] McMinn D J W, Daniel J, Ziaee H, et al. Indications and results of hip resurfacing[J]. International orthopaedics, 2011, 35(2): 231-237.

[13] Grigoris, Peter, Roberts, Paul. The evolution of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. The Orthopedic clinics of North America [J] , 2005 (36): 125-134.