Predicted Potential Distributions of Two Rare and Critically Endangered Bird Species in China Based on the MaxEnt Model

Ting Luo; Hua Zhang

doi:10.54097/sqj6v443

Authors

Ting Luo
Hua Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/sqj6v443

Keywords:

Emberiza Aureola, Aythya Baeri, MaxEnt, Potential Suitable Habitat, Critically Endangered Species

Abstract

Biodiversity loss has become a global ecological crisis, and the conservation of Critically Endangered (CR) species is particularly urgent. In response, this study focuses on two CR bird species with markedly contrasting ecological traits, Emberiza aureola and Aythya baeri. Using species occurrence records and 22 environmental variables, we applied the MaxEnt model to simulate their potential suitable habitats. The results indicate that: the distribution of Emberiza aureola is primarily driven by precipitation of the driest month, precipitation seasonality, and slope. Its habitat suitability shows a unimodal response to isothermality and is enhanced in flat plains characterised by higher precipitation in the driest month and moderate precipitation seasonality. In contrast, Aythya baeri is strongly influenced by slope, precipitation of the warmest quarter, and mean temperature of the driest quarter, exhibiting a bimodal response to isothermality. Its suitability peaks under low precipitation conditions in the warmest quarter, reflecting its reliance on shallow, low-disturbance wetlands in open plains. The spatial distribution patterns of the two species differ markedly. Although both are confined to low-relief areas with slopes below 1°, the suitable habitats of Emberiza aureola are more extensive and continuous, with high-suitability areas concentrated in the Northeast China Plain and eastern Inner Mongolia. In contrast, the suitable habitats of Aythya baeri are highly fragmented and concentrated in the coastal wetlands of Liaodong Bay and the lake systems of the middle and lower Yangtze River Basin. By systematically comparing the distributional patterns of these two CR species at a macroecological scale, this study clarifies the constraints imposed by climatic and topographic factors, providing scientific support for optimising China’s protected area networks, implementing targeted wetland restoration, and advancing differentiated habitat management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Ceballos G, Ehrlich P R, Barnosky A D, et al. Accelerated modern human-induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Science Advances, 2015, 1(5): e1400253.

[2] Guisan A, Tingley R, Baumgartner J B, et al. Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions. Ecology Letters, 2013, 16(12): 1424–1435.

[3] Zheng G. A Checklist on the Classification and Distribution of the Birds of China (4th ed.). Science Press, 2023.

[4] IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2023-1, 2024.

[5] Kamp J, Oppel S, Heldbjerg H, et al. Global population collapse in a super-abundant migratory bird and illegal trapping in China. Conservation Biology, 2015, 29(6): 1684–1694.

[6] Wang X, Barter M, Cao L, et al. Serious population decline of the Baer’s Pochard Aythya baeri in China. Bird Conservation International, 2012, 22(3): 261–267.

[7] Li X, Hu B, Wang X, et al. Climate change and lack of protection may lead to the extinction of the critically endangered Baer's Pochard. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 117: 106674.

[8] Heim W, Chan S, Hölzel N, et al. East Asian buntings: Ongoing population collapse and Palaearctic–Indomalayan range shifts. Conservation Science and Practice, 2021, 3(10): e501.

[9] Tamada K, Tomida H, Uematsu A. Migration routes and stopover sites of the Yellow-breasted Bunting Emberiza aureola. Ornithological Science, 2018, 17(2): 223–229.

[10] Peterson A T. Ecological niche conservatism: A time-structured review of evidence. Journal of Biogeography, 2011, 38(5): 817–827.

[11] Phillips S J, Anderson R P, Schapire R E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 2006, 190(3-4): 231–259.

[12] Wisz M S, Hijmans R J, Li J, et al. Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Diversity and Distributions, 2008, 14(5): 763–773.

[13] Warren D L, Glor R E, Turelli M. ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Ecography, 2014, 37(10): 960–964.

[14] Kou S, Zhang M, Zhang Y, et al. Identifying potential suitable habitat for endangered giant pandas under climate change using MaxEnt model. Ecological Informatics, 2022, 72: 101859.

[15] Naimi B, Hamm N A S, Groen T A, et al. usdm: An R package for species distribution modelling and ecological forecasting. Ecography, 2014, 37(10): 1018–1023.

[16] Elith J, Phillips S J, Hastie T, et al. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions, 2011, 17(5): 43–57.

[17] Zhang B X, Li C L, Zuo X K, et al. Impacts of climate change on potential habitat suitability of red-crowned cranes in the autumn migration. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(12): 5194–5205.

[18] Jiang Z, Shao M Q, Wang J Y. Simulation of spatial and temporal patterns of suitable wintering habitat for Hooded Crane (Grus monacha) under climate and land use change scenarios. Animals, 2025, 15: 6.

[19] Yang J Y, Ding G Y, Tian X J. Research progress on the application of the MaxEnt model in species habitat prediction. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(2): 614–624.

[20] Beermann I, Thomas A, Heim W, et al. Range-wide breeding habitat use of the critically endangered Yellow-breasted Bunting Emberiza aureola after population collapse. Ecology and Evolution, 2021, 11(15): 10460–10476.

[21] Heim W, Anisimov Y, Bastardot M, et al. Migration routes and adult survival of the critically endangered Yellow-breasted Bunting Emberiza aureola. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14: 30593.

[22] Hijmans R J, Cameron S E, Parra J L, et al. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 2005, 25(15): 1965–1978.

[23] Sibilia C D, Aguirre-Gutiérrez J, Mowbray L, et al. Effects of submerged aquatic vegetation and water quality on waterfowl abundance by foraging guild. Ecological Solutions and Evidence, 2022, 3(1): e12137.

[24] Tian Z, Huo D, Yi K, et al. Evaluation of suitable habitats for birds based on MaxEnt and Google Earth Engine: A case study of Baer’s Pochard (Aythya baeri) in Baiyangdian, China. Remote Sensing, 2024, 16(1): 64.

[25] Wang X, Barter M, Cao L, et al. Serious contractions in wintering distribution and decline in abundance of Baer’s Pochard (Aythya baeri). Bird Conservation International, 2012, 22(2): 121–133.

[26] BirdLife International. Species factsheet: Yellow-breasted Bunting Emberiza aureola. 2024.

[27] BirdLife International. Species factsheet: Baer’s Pochard Aythya baeri. 2024.

[28] Wu L, Wang C, Li J, et al. Shifted to the south, shifted to the north, but no expansion: Potential suitable habitat distribution shift and conservation gap of the critically endangered Baer’s Pochard (Aythya baeri). Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(9): 2171.

[29] Chen B, Sun Y H, Zhang Y Y. Conservation of waterbirds in China’s wetlands: Threats and strategies. Chinese Birds, 2011, 2(2): 81–92.

[30] Ma Z, Cai Y, Li B, et al. Managing wetland habitats for waterbirds: An international perspective. Wetlands, 2010, 30: 15–27.

[31] Xu Z, Jia Y, Zhang M. Effects of water level fluctuation on wetland birds in the Yangtze River floodplain. Hydrobiologia, 2019, 829: 135–149.

[32] Benton T G, Vickery J A, Wilson J D. Farmland biodiversity: Is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2003, 18(4): 182–188.

[33] Li X, Wang X, Fox A D. Agricultural intensification and its impacts on bird communities in northern China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2020, 304: 107142.

[34] Humphrey L, Taylor C M. Climate variability effects on waterbird populations: A global synthesis. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2020, 29(6): 1015–1030.

[35] Wu X, Shi Y, Xu C, et al. Response of East Asian waterbird distributions to climate variability. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 66: 287–297.