The Technical System, Clinical Application and Future Prospects of Pluripotent Stem Cells (ESC/iPSC) Mediated Nerve Regeneration

Authors

  • Daiyi Yang Zhengzhou Foreign Language School, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450001, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/k892xc29

Keywords:

Pluripotent Stem Cells, Neural Regeneration, Clinical Application, Spinal Cord Injury

Abstract

This review systematically outlines the technological framework and clinical applications of neural regeneration mediated by pluripotent stem cells (ESCs/iPSCs). The article first compares the fundamental differences between the two: ESCs face ethical controversies regarding their embryonic origin and challenges related to immune rejection; while iPSCs support autologous transplantation, their reprogramming process may lead to genomic abnormalities, and the presence of residual undifferentiated cells poses a tumorigenic risk. The article traces the trend of directed differentiation technologies evolving from two-dimensional culture to three-dimensional organoids and details their practical applications in diseases such as stroke, Alzheimer's disease, and spinal cord injury—particularly in spinal cord injury models, where transplanted cells have achieved long-distance axonal regeneration and circuit reconstruction. Addressing core bottlenecks currently facing the field—such as low differentiation efficiency, difficulties in functional integration, and tumorigenicity—this paper explores breakthrough pathways through cutting-edge technologies including gene editing, organoids, and AI-enabled approaches. Finally, it compares the clinical advantages and disadvantages of ESCs and iPSCs, noting that while challenges remain, the deep integration of interdisciplinary technologies is accelerating the translation of stem cell therapies into standard clinical treatments, bringing revolutionary hope to patients with neurological diseases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Kirkeby, A., Main, H., & Carpenter, M. (2025). Pluripotent stem cell derived therapies in clinical trial: A 2025 update. Cell Stem Cell, 32(1), 10–37. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j. stem. 2024. 12. 005.

[2] Sugai, K., Nakamura, M., & Okano, H. (2025). Stem cell therapies for spinal cord injury in humans: A review of recent clinical research. Brain and Spine, 5, 104207. https://doi.org/ 10. 1016/j.brainsp.2025.104207PMC.

[3] Jeon, J., Cha, Y., Hong, Y. J., Kim, S., Lee, J., & Park, H. (2025). Pre clinical safety and efficacy of human induced pluripotent stem cell derived products for autologous cell therapy in Parkinson's disease. Cell Stem Cell, 32(3), 343–360.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2025.02.008PMC.

[4] Chen, X., Li, Y., Wang, Z., & Zhang, L. (2022). Structural and functional integration of transplanted stem cells with host neural circuits in hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy model. Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligent Technology Innovation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1, 1–12.

[5] Takahashi, J. (2025). iPSC based cell replacement therapy: From basic research to clinical application. Cytotherapy, 27(7), 835–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2025.01.015.

Downloads

Published

28-08-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Yang, D. (2026). The Technical System, Clinical Application and Future Prospects of Pluripotent Stem Cells (ESC/iPSC) Mediated Nerve Regeneration. International Journal of Biology and Life Sciences, 16(2), 56-59. https://doi.org/10.54097/k892xc29