Wireless Brain-Machine Interfaces: Key Technologies and Future Perspectives

Authors

  • Changshuo Hu College of Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/889sqs72

Keywords:

wireless brain-machine interface, implantable neurotechnology, neural signal acquisition, wireless energy transfer, clinical translation.

Abstract

Research on Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) has reached a stage where the limited experimental work needs to be translated into real-world, practical applications. Wireless technology is one of the most crucial methods to implement the translation. This review systematically examines the core technologies enabling fully implantable wireless BMIs, with a focus on the fundamental design challenge: the trilemma involving data rate, power consumption, and device size. The paper outlines the essential system architecture, including neural signal acquisition, processing, wireless transmission, and power supply modules. It provides a comparative analysis of wireless transmission methods, such as radio frequency, optical, and ultrasonic communications. The study evaluates their bandwidth, tissue penetration, and efficiency. Furthermore, implant powering strategies are contrasted, weighing the limitations of batteries against the potential of wireless energy transfer. The review highlights transformative applications in neuro-prosthetics and neuroscience research, illustrated through notable experimental and clinical demonstrations. Ultimately, it identifies persistent challenges related to long-term bio-integration and scalability, indicating future directions for developing more robust, intelligent, and clinically adaptive wireless BMI systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Musk, E., & Neuralink. (2019). An integrated brain-machine interface platform with thousands of channels. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(10), e16194. https://doi.org/10.2196/16194

[2] USC Polymer MEA Resource. (2023). Research – Flexible polymer microelectrode array resource. University of Southern California. https://sites.usc.edu/polymermea/research-2/

[3] Galinsky, V. L., & Frank, L. R. (2025). The wave nature of the action potential. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 19, 1467466. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2025.1467466

[4] Zhang, B., Deng, C., Cai, C., & Li, X. (2022). In vivo neural interfaces—From small- to large-scale recording. Frontiers in Nanotechnology, 4, 885411. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnano.2022.885411

[5] Wang, J., Hu, J., Guan, C., Hou, Y., Xu, Z., Sun, L., … Yu, S. (2024). High-speed GaN-based laser diode with modulation bandwidth exceeding 5 GHz for 20 Gbps visible light communication. Photonics Research, 12(6), 1186. https://www.opticsjournal.net/Articles/OJbf947ef4bd2f103d/FullText

[6] Xu, H., Ai, J., Deng, T., Ruan, Y., Sun, D., Liao, Y., … Tian, P. (2025). Recent progress in GaN based high bandwidth micro LEDs and photodetectors for high speed visible light communication. Photonics, 12(7), 730. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12070730

[7] Coherent. (2025). High-speed photodetectors and receivers. Coherent Networking Components. https://www.coherent.com/networking/communication-components/detectors-receivers/photodetectors

[8] Chen, M., Pan, L., Lin, Q., Cheng, L., & Ming, D. (2023). 70%-power transmission efficiency, 3.39 Mbps power and data telemetry over a single 13.56 MHz inductive link for biomedical implants. Science China Information Sciences, 66, 122406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-022-3563-9

[9] Trautmann, E. M., Hesse, J. K., Stine, G. M., Xia, R., Zhu, S., O’Shea, D. J., … Harris, T. D. (2025). Large scale high density brain wide neural recording in nonhuman primates. Nature Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-025-01976-5

[10] Song, Z., Alpers, A., Warner, K., Iacobucci, F., Hoskins, E., Disterhoft, J. F., & Widge, A. S. (2024). Chronic, reusable, multiday Neuropixels recordings during free moving operant behavior. eNeuro, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0245 23.2023

[11] Hong, S. (2025). Wireless optogenetic microsystems accelerate artificial intelligence–neuroscience coevolution through embedded closed loop system. Micromachines, 16(5), 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16050557

[12] Grosenick, L., Marshel, J. H., & Deisseroth, K. (2015). Closed loop and activity guided optogenetic control. Neuron, 86(1), 106–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.034

[13] Nourizonoz, A., Girard, B., Guyoton, M., Galiñanes, G., Thurnherr, R., Pellat, S., Bellone, C., & Huber, D. (2025). BlueBerry: Closed loop wireless optogenetic manipulation in freely moving animals. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.30.635697

[14] Simeral, J., et al. (2021). BrainGate: High bandwidth wireless brain computer interface for humans. ScienceDaily. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/04/210401112415.htm

[15] NeuroPace Inc. (n.d.). The NeuroPace RNS® System for responsive neurostimulation. Brain Initiative, NIH. https://braininitiative.nih.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ppp_rns_device_info_508c.pdf

[16] University of Pittsburgh, Department of Neurological Surgery. (n.d.). Responsive neurostimulation (RNS). https://www.neurosurgery.pitt.edu/centers/epilepsy/responsive-neurostimulation

[17] NeuronovAI. (2025). Neural dust and nano brain sensors: Tiny implants for real time brain mapping and therapy. https://www.neuronovai.com/academic/article/neural-dust-and-nano-brain-sensors-tiny-implants-for-real-time-brain-mapping-and-therapy/

[18] Costello, J. T., Nason-Tomaszewski, S. R., An, H., Lee, J., Mender, M. J., Temmar, H., … Chestek, C. A. (2022). A low-power communication scheme for wireless, 1000-channel brain–machine interfaces. Journal of Neural Engineering, 19(3), 036037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ac7352

[19] Lee, S., Silva, S. M., Caballero Aguilar, L. M., Eom, T., Moulton, S. E., & Shim, B. S. (2022). Biodegradable bioelectronics for biomedical applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 10, 8577–8604. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TB01475K

[20] Haerinia, M., & Shadid, R. (2020). Wireless power transfer approaches for medical implants: A review. Signals, 1(2), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.3390/signals1020012

[21] Yuvarajan, A., Vishnu, G., & Saranraj, N. (2025). Multiharvested self-powered systems: Harnessing biological energy for implantable medical devices. Biomedical Materials & Devices, 4, 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44174-025-00282-9

Downloads

Published

27-08-2026

Issue

Section

Articles