Comparative Analysis of Mining Damage Evaluation Methods for Mining Buildings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ije.v3i1.10150Keywords:
Mining Damage Assessment, PCA, AHP, Entropy Weight Method, CorrelationAbstract
In the eastern mining areas of China, coal mining under buildings is more common. In order to alleviate the contradiction between coal mining under buildings and the relationship between workers and farmers, it is necessary to evaluate the degree of damage to buildings in a more objective and scientific way. Taking the buildings in the surface movement basin in Fengfeng Mining District of Handan City as the research object, 15 residential buildings with different degrees of damage were selected as sampling points, and data including four surface movement deformation parameters and five parameters of the buildings' own attributes were collected. In order to objectively calculate the influence of each indicator, two methods, namely principal component analysis and AHP entropy weighting, were used to calculate the influence of the indicators on the damage of the buildings. The results show that the index system selected in the paper is scientific and objective, with the building's own attributes accounting for 0.57. In the evaluation model using principal component analysis, the evaluation of the building damage evaluation results exactly matches the evaluation of the field survey results, which proves the feasibility of applying the method to the evaluation of mining damage in mining areas. The significance of Bartlett's test of 0.228 showed that the indicators were extremely uncorrelated, proving that the AHP entropy method of assigning weights is applicable to the evaluation of mining damage to buildings in mining areas in an indicator system where the indicators are weakly correlated.
Downloads
References
National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Sta-tistical Yearbook2017. [M]. ChinaStatistics Press,2017.
XU Naizhong, GAO Chao, LIU Gui,et al.Study of Surface Movement Defor-mation Critical Value of House Damage in Mining InfluenceArea[J].Coal Mining Techno-logy.2017, 22 (4): 65-69.
HU Zhenqi, XIAO Wu: Some thoughts on green development strategy of coalindustry:from aspects of ecological restoration [J]. Coal Science and Technology2020,48(4):35-42
ZHANG Bin. Exquisite Detection Method and Optimization of Mine Implicit Disaster [J].Coal Mining Technology, 2016, 21 (4): 26-32.
State Administration of Safety Superv-ision, State Coal Mine Safety Administration, National Energy Administration et al. Code for coal pillar retentionand coal pressing mining of buildings, water bodies, railways and main tunnels[M]. Beijing: China Co-al Industry Press.2017.
GU Xiao-min, WU Zuo-qi.Building and Applicationof Mining Damage Evaluation Syste-m in Coal Mine[J]. Coal Mining Technology 2017,22(4):75-78.
CUI Ximin, CHE Yuhang,ZHAO Yuling,et al.Furth-er discussion on mining deformation and building damage classification [J].Journal of China Coal So-ciety. 2021, 46(1): 145-153.
Guo Wenbing, Wu Caifang, Deng Kazhong. Artifi-cial neural network predictionmodel of mininginduced damage of buildings [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering (Natural Science) 2014,23(4)58 3-587.
HE Rong, WANG Bin. Fuzzy evaluationof damage degree of buildings based on analytic hierarchy p-rocess[J].Journalof Henan Polytechnic University (Natural Science) 2017,36 (1): 32-37.
HE Rong, WANG Bin, YANG Wenli.Grey correlation model for assessment of mining damage grade of buildings in mining area[J]. Journal of Henan Polytechnic University(Natural Science) 2016, 35(4):482-486.
LIU Xiaopeng GUO, Guangli, XU Liangji et al.Research on the comprehensive evaluation of buildingdamage in mining area [J].China Mining Magazine.2019,28(4):168-172.
WANG Wenna, WU Kan, CHEN Ranli,et al.Comprehensive evaluation of building damage in miningarea ba-sed on GIS and random forest[J].Coal Sc-ienceand Technology. 2022, 5 (3): 201-207.
CUI Xi-min, ZHANG Bing, PENG Chao. Current status and progress on theestimation of mining induced buildingdamage [J]. Journal ofChina Coal Society.2015,40(8):1718-1728.
SONG Xiaoqiu: The principle and method of fuzzymathematics [M].Xuzhou:China University of mining and Technology Press,2004:201-203.
World Database of Development Indicators [OL].http:// wdi. worldbank. org/table.2021-07-11/2021-08-11.
SAATY: The analytic hierarchy process:Planning,priority setting, resources allocation[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill Company, 1980.
Zhang Yanju: The comparative research on system assessment method [D].Nanjing: Hohai University,2005.
WEN Xinglin, GE Zhengchen, WANG Rumeng.Study on safey evaluation model of mining damage of building in mining area based on "AHP+EWM" optimization combination weightion [J]. Journal of North China Institute of Science and Technology, 2022,19(3):25-31.


