Numerical Simulation of Progressive CO2 Injection for Improved Coalbed Methane Extraction and Carbon Sequestration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/720jhb82Keywords:
Numerical Simulation, Progressive CO2 Injection, Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery, CO2-CH4 Displacement, Carbon Capture and StorageAbstract
A numerical simulation-based comparative analysis was conducted to investigate the displacement and extraction performance of coalbed methane (CH4) under two CO2 injection strategies: direct injection and progressive staged injection. Results show that direct CO2 injection rapidly generates high-pressure zones, elevates reservoir pressure, and reduces permeability, leading to limited methane depletion and strong spatial heterogeneity in the extraction zone. In contrast, progressive CO2 injection integrates staged pressurization with pressure-relief extraction, effectively lowering reservoir pressure, maintaining higher permeability, and significantly expanding the CH4 extraction range. For both strategies, CH4 recovery and CO2 sequestration increased continuously with time; however, the progressive scheme achieved smoother and more efficient CH4 production while sustaining sequestration effectiveness. After 300 days of injection and extraction, the average CH4 content declined from 17.09 m3/t to 10.31 m3/t, yielding 1.69 × 105 m3 of recovered CH4 and 2.97 × 105 m3 of sequestered CO2. These findings demonstrate that progressive CO2 injection can simultaneously enhance coalbed methane recovery and CO2 geological storage, offering technical insights for efficient CBM development and mine gas control.
Downloads
References
[1] Y. Yao, X. Sun, L. Wan. Micro-mechanism of geological sequestration of CO2 in coal seam.J. Coal Geology & Exploration. 51(2), 146-157 (2023). https://doi.org/10. 12363/ issn. 1001-1986.22.11.0868.
[2] W.Z. Cao, J.Q. Shi, S. Durucan, et al. Gas-driven rapid fracture propagation under unloading conditions in coal and gas outbursts. J. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 130, 104325 (2020). https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j. ijrmms.2020.104325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104325
[3] Y.G. Zhai, D.Y. Song, Y.B. Li. Experimental study of effect of temperature and pressure on the desorption rate of coal bed methane.J. Coal Science and Technology. 52(S1), 80-85 (2024). https://doi.org/10.12438/cst.2023-0958.
[4] J.T. Shi, Q.W. Fan, Y.X. Cao, et al. Acidification oxidation reagent system optimization on coal seams and stimulation effect evaluation.J. Journal of China Coal Society. 49(4), 1989-2003 (2024). https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2023.0789.
[5] S. Shuxun, L. Yuan, S. Liu, et al. Geological technology for carbon neutrality and its application prospect for low carbon coal exploitation and utilization.J. Journal of China Coal Society. 47(4), 1430-1451 (2022). https://doi.org/10. 13225/j. cnki.jccs.2021.1189.
[6] A. Busch, Y. Gensterblum. CBM and CO2-ECBM related sorption processes in coal.J. International Journal of Coal Geology. 87(2), 49-71 (2011). https://doi.org/10. 1016/j. coal. 2011.06.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2011.04.011
[7] S. Shuxun, W. Teng, S. Liu, et al. Research progress and prospects of large-scale full process CCUS technology in power plants.J. Natural Gas Industry. 44(12), 187-198 (2024). https://doi.org/10.11764/j.issn.1000-0976.2024.12.018.
[8] H.J. Guo, H.L. Tang, K. Wang, Y.C. Wu, J.G. Wu, L.H. Guan, C. Xu. Application of gas-solid coupling effect in the gas drainage with double boreholes along coal seam.J. Xi'an Univ. Sci. Technol. 41(2), 221-229 (2021). https://doi.org/10. 13800/j. cnki.xakjdxxb.2021.0206.
[9] B.K. Prusty. Sorption of methane and CO₂ for enhanced coalbed methane recovery and carbon dioxide sequestration.J. Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry. 17(1), 29-38 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-9953(08)60005-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-9953(08)60022-5
[10] S. Chattaraj, D. Mohanty, T. Kumar, G. Halder. Thermodynamics, kinetics and modeling of sorption behaviour of coalbed methane - A review.J. Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources. 16, 14-33 (2016). https://doi.org/ 10. 1016/j.juogr.2016.09.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juogr.2016.09.001
[11] N. Li, S. Jia, Z. Sun, H. Liu, Y. Zhang. Exploitation of CH4 hydrate reservoir reformed by (CO2+N2) gas injection. Chem.J. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress. 41(5), 2356-2363 (2022). https://doi.org/10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2021-1592.
[12] X.D. Liu, S.X. Sang, X.Z. Zhou, et al. Numerical simulation of CO₂-ECBM based on 3D heterogeneous geological model.J. Journal of China Coal Society. 48(7), 2773-2790 (2023). https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.CN23.3258.
[13] C. Cheng, X.Y. Ma, A.T. Zhou, K.Q. Yi. Numerical study of the influence of well spacing on the production and storage of CO₂-ECBM.J. Journal of Energy Engineering. 151(2), 04025010 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7897. 0002215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/JLEED9.EYENG-5813
[14] L.F. Zhang, Y.G. Yang, Y.L. Mu, N. Fan, K. Liu, W.J. Yao. Numerical study of heat injection CO2 to increase CH₄ production based on gas-water two-phase flow.J. Coal Science and Technology. 52(3), 115-128 (2024). https://doi.org/10. 12438/ cst.2023-0690.
[15] J. Tang, C. Wang, Y. Chen, et al. Determination of critical value of an outburst risk prediction index of working face in a coal roadway based on initial gas emission from a borehole and its application: A case study.J. Fuel. 267, 117229 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117229
[16] Z. Li, G. Wei, R. Liang, et al. LCO₂-ECBM technology for preventing coal and gas outburst: Integrated effect of permeability improvement and gas displacement.J. Fuel. 285, 119219 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.119219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119219
[17] Z.L. Fan, G.W. Fan, D.S. Zhang, et al. Depth-responsive mechanisms of carbon sequestration-enhanced gas recovery mechanisms and critical burial depth effects.J. Journal of China Coal Society. 50(8), 4033-4053 (2025). https://doi. org/10. 13225/j. cnki.jccs.dm25.0118.
[18] C.J. Fan, S. Li, M.K. Luo, Z.H. Yang, H.H. Zhang, S. Wang. Deep CBM extraction numerical simulation based on hydraulic-mechanical-thermal coupled model.J. Journal of China Coal Society. 41(12), 3076-3085 (2016). https://doi.org/ 10. 13225/j.cnki.jccs.2016.1008.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

