Management Method for Commissioning AI-Based Real-Time Closed-Loop Operation Systems in Refining and Petrochemical Units
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/dkwb5h03Keywords:
Refining and Petrochemical Units, AI-based Real-time Closed-loop Operation System, Closed-loop Commissioning, Project Management, Category-based EvaluationAbstract
AI-based real-time closed-loop operation systems for refining and petrochemical units integrate model computation, strategy generation, and control execution into the production control chain. Consequently, management evaluation of their closed-loop commissioning cannot be limited to confirming whether the software system has completed engineering delivery. It must also determine separately whether the models can continuously and stably produce reliable computational results, whether the control chain can execute strategies under constraints, and whether the system achieves the expected operational outcomes after being placed in sustained operation. To meet the management needs associated with the application of this innovative technology, this paper proposes a category-based evaluation method for closed-loop commissioning. The method divides the evaluation objects into four categories—engineering delivery, model capability, closed-loop execution, and sustained operation and outcomes—establishes indicators, evidence, a statistical basis, and evaluation conclusions for each category, and defines rules for matching evidence to conclusions, making itemized determinations, and updating conclusions. Using the commissioning of an AI-based real-time closed-loop operation system in Yunnan Petrochemical's 13-million-metric-ton-per-year atmospheric and vacuum distillation unit (AVDU) as a case study, the category-based evaluation method produces separate, evidence-based conclusions on construction results, model performance, closed-loop capability, and operational outcomes, thereby providing refining and petrochemical units with an approach to managing and evaluating system commissioning that is suited to technological innovation.
Downloads
References
[1] State Administration for Market Regulation, Standardization Administration of China. (2020). GB/T 39116—2020 Maturity model of intelligent manufacturing capability. Standards Press of China.
[2] State Administration for Market Regulation, Standardization Administration of China. (2020). GB/T 39117—2020 Maturity assessment method of intelligent manufacturing capability. Standards Press of China.
[3] ISO. (2021). ISO 23247-1:2021 Automation systems and integration—Digital twin framework for manufacturing—Part 1: Overview and general principles. ISO.
[4] ISO. (2021). ISO 23247-2:2021 Automation systems and integration—Digital twin framework for manufacturing—Part 2: Reference architecture. ISO.
[5] ISO/IEC. (2023). ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Information technology—Artificial intelligence—Management system. ISO.
[6] ISO/IEC. (2023). ISO/IEC 23894:2023 Information technology—Artificial intelligence—Guidance on risk management. ISO.
[7] IEC. (2017). IEC 61511-1:2016+AMD1:2017 Functional safety—Safety instrumented systems for the process industry sector—Part 1. IEC.
[8] Qin, S. J., & Badgwell, T. A. (2003). A survey of industrial model predictive control technology. Control Engineering Practice, 11(7), 733–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0661(02) 00186-7.
[9] Bauer, M., & Craig, I. K. (2008). Economic assessment of advanced process control—A survey and framework. Journal of Process Control, 18(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j. jprocont. 2007.05.007.
[10] Kadlec, P., Gabrys, B., & Strandt, S. (2009). Data-driven soft sensors in the process industry. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 33(4), 795–814. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j. compchemeng. 2008.12.012.
[11] Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2020). Digital twin: Values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective. IEEE Access, 8, 21980–22012. https://doi.org/10.1109/ ACCESS. 2020.2970143.
[12] Forbes, M. G., Patwardhan, R. S., Hamadah, H., & Gopaluni, R. B. (2015). Model predictive control in industry: Challenges and opportunities. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(8), 531–538. https: // doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.09.022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

