Research on the Personal Income Tax of Chinese Network Anchors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/jid.v5i1.06Keywords:
Network Anchors, Personal Income TaxAbstract
With the progress of Internet technology in China, with the outbreak of novel coronavirus at the end of 2019, the development of offline industry is sluggish, but the development of webcast industry is more rapid. At the same time, there are many hidden problems behind the rapid development. From 2021 to 2022, multiple malicious incidents of online anchors evading taxes were exposed, involving a huge amount of money and attracting widespread attention nationwide. Our country's financial revenue has also caused great losses in the cases of tax evasion and evasion by these online anchors. In addition to the quality of anchors, it also reflects that China's development in personal income tax supervision has not caught up with the development of the anchor industry in a timely manner. Currently, the tax authorities attach great importance to this issue and have successively introduced some regulations on tax related matters in the online live streaming industry. However, China's laws and regulations related to personal income tax are not sufficient to meet the requirements of tax supervision. The state maintains social stability, improves infrastructure, and provides complete social security. As public figures, internet anchors, based on their own influence, cannot shirk their corresponding social responsibilities. They should bear the obligation of positive publicity and guidance to the public, and the most basic step is to pay taxes in accordance with the law. The online live streaming industry is not an impossible place, but a place full of enthusiasm and a sense of responsibility to achieve self-worth.
Downloads
References
Berenson. Income tax Administration trends for Network anchors [J]. Information Visualization,2008,17(3).
Susana Aldeia. A New Approach to E-Commerce Multi-Agent Systems[J].The Annals of Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati Fascicle III Electrotechnics Electronics Automatic Control and Informatics, 2017(1): 11-18.
Gatchair. ldeology and Interests in Tax Administration Reform in Jamaica[J]Politics and Policy,2015, Vol.43(6).
Omar Khalil. Recognition and Measurement Obstacles of the Conceptual Framework of Fonancial Accounting Underlying E-commerce Business[J]. Internet Bank Commer, vol.21.2016.
Jason Huang, Juan Rios. The Battle Over E-commerce Sales Taxes Heats Up[J]. Journal of Information Systems Management, 2016.28(4):321-326.
Nora`a D K. Tax Compliance within the Context of Gain and Loss Situations, Expected and Current Asset Position, and Profession [J]. Journal of Economic Psychology, vol.22.2016.
Jonathan. Fox W.E.Commerce in the Context of Declining State Sales Tax Bases[J].National Tax Journal,December 3,2018;53(4):1373-1388.
Jason Axelrod.An Exploratory Study on Consumer Purchase Behavior From Live Webcasting E-Commerce:A Means-End Chain Analysis Using Amazon Live Webcasting [J]. International Journal of Online Marketing (IJOM), 2017, 10(3):10-20.
Grant Coulter. “Taxation of Digital Goods and Services,”New York University Annual Survey of American Law,vol.70,2017.
Ulph D, Da Mjanovic T.Tax progressivity,income distribution and tax non-compliance[J].European Economic Review, 2020, 54 (4):594-607.
Chang Gyun Park,Jin Kwon Hyun. Examining the Determinants of Tax Compliance by Experim ental Data:A Case of Korea[J].Journal of Policy Modeling.2018(25):673-684.
Connie Smotek. Rationalizing Tax Administration Reform in Philippine [J].Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics.2018,Vol.24(1).