A Review of 1:10,000 Scale Geological Hazard Risk Investigation and Assessment

Xue Han; Jingkang Feng; Yan Wang; Chuanghui He

doi:10.54097/psrffj62

Authors

Xue Han
Jingkang Feng
Yan Wang
Chuanghui He

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/psrffj62

Keywords:

Geological hazards; 1:10,000 scale investigation; Risk assessment; Technical methodologies.

Abstract

This paper comprehensively elaborates on the relevant aspects of 1:10,000 geological disaster risk survey and assessment. It introduces its background and significance, provides a detailed analysis of the main survey and assessment contents, including geological disaster hazard identification, analysis of disaster-pregnant geological conditions, survey of elements at risk, and risk assessment. It discusses the survey methodologies and technologies combining traditional and modern approaches, synthesizes the applications of the outcomes, and prospects future development trends. The aim is to provide a comprehensive reference for geological disaster risk survey and assessment work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Farid, A. (2016). Geohazards Caused by Human Activity. IntechOpen.

[2] Wang, C. (1997). Man-made geological hazards and geological environment. Journal of Engineering Geology, 5 (4), 75–80.

[3] Chen, W., Zhong, C., Qin, X., Liu, J., Li, Y., & Li, J. (2023). Geological disaster: An overview. In W. Chen, C. Zhong, X. Qin, J. Liu, Y. Li, & J. Li (Eds.), Intelligent interpretation for geological disasters: From space-air-ground integration perspective (pp. 1–23). Springer Nature Singapore.

[4] Varnes, D. J. (1978). Slope movement types and processes. In R. L. Schuster & R. J. Krizek (Eds.), Landslides: Analysis and Control (Special Report 176, pp. 11–33). Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.

[5] Li, Z., & Wang, X. (2024). Comparative study on evaluation performance of different units for susceptibility of accumulation layer landslides in Qinling-Bashan Mountains at town scale. Northwestern Geology, *57*(1), 1–11.

[6] Liang, F. (2022). Identification of typical geological disasters in high-steep mountain areas of Sichuan based on remote sensing technology and deep learning [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Chengdu University of Technology.

[7] Yang, X., Li, Y., Tong, B., Hu, D., & Li, X. (2016). Design and implementation of geological disaster field survey data acquisition system based on mobile 3S technology. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 27 (4), 93–96, 113.

[8] Wu, M., Cui, Z., Yi, X., Li, M., & Yang, Y. (2023). Comprehensive remote sensing identification of geological hazards in Xiangbiling-Yezhutang section of Baihetan reservoir area. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 40 (4), 155–163.

[9] Zhang, Z., Chen, G., & Zhang, J. (2025). Development characteristics and disaster-forming patterns of geological hazards in Su-Xi-Chang area. Yangtze River, 56 (S1), 163–169.

[10] Wang, J., Wei, Y., Mei, A., Zhang, M., & Hu, X. (2021). Multi-dimensional extraction and application analysis of loess landslide information based on UAV oblique photography. Geology in China, 48 (2), 388–401.

[11] Wang, X., Ma, C., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Susceptibility assessment of shallow loess landslides: A case study of the Caijiachuan farmland small watershed in the loess area of Western Shanxi. Mountain Research, 41 (6), 904–915.

[12] Wang, X., Wen, Y., Wei, B., Zhang, L., & Wang, J. (2025). Resilience assessment and obstacle factor analysis of geological disasters in Baoji City. Journal of Baoji University of Arts and Sciences (Natural Science Edition), 45 (1), 64–71.

[13] Lin, P., He, S., Xianmusiyan·Abudikeyimu, Li, X., & Wang, R. (2024). Landslide susceptibility assessment along highways based on logistic regression-fuzzy analytic hierarchy process model. Journal of Natural Disasters, 33 (6), 27–36.

[14] Luo, L., Pei, X., Pei, Z., Huang, B., & Tian, S. (2018). Distribution characteristics and susceptibility study of sand-slipping slopes in the northern piedmont of Tianshan Mountains. Journal of Catastrophology, 33 (2), 200–205, 211.