Research on the Legislative Path of China’s AI Risk Classification and Full-cycle Regulatory——Based on the Experience of the EU AI Act

Authors

  • Jingya He

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/p1dhm702

Keywords:

EU AI Act, Risk classification, Full-cycle regulatory, China’s AI legislation.

Abstract

As the world’s first comprehensive AI regulatory legislation, the EU AI Act establishes a dynamic regulatory mechanism covering the whole chain of R&D, deployment, and application through a four-level classification system. In particular, it strictly regulates the implementation of algorithm impact assessment, external entity certification and ex post accountability for high-risk systems, providing an institutional model for the balance between technological innovation and risk prevention and control. China’s current AI legislation is based on the Data Security Law and the Personal Information Protection Law. There are shortcomings in risk classification management, whole chain supervision, and international standard mutual recognition. Learn from the experience of the EU, and enlighten China to establish scenario risk assessment indicators in the fields of health care, finance, etc., support cross sectoral expert committees and dynamic list management, and consider combining the full cycle regulatory logic of the EU with China’s regulatory sandbox mechanism, to improve the whole chain regulatory system from algorithm impact assessment to post responsibility inversion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Yu Pinxian, Liu Qian. Review of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act and Implications[J]. Hainan Finance, 2023(06)45-53.

[2] Zeng Xiong, Liang Zheng, Zhang Hui. The Regulatory Path of Artificial Intelligence in the European Union and its Implications for China: Taking the “Artificial Intelligence Act” as an Analysis Object[J]. E-Government, 2022(09)63-72.

[3] Zhang Linghan. What Kind of “AI Law” Should China Have?——Basic Logic and Systemic Structure of China’s AI Legislative Framework[J]. Science of Law (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), 2024, 42(03): 3-17.

[4] Huang Jingyi. The Construction of Artificial Intelligence Regulatory System in parallel with “Hierarchical Classification” and “Contract” Risk Governance——The EU AI Act is Used as the Object of Analysis[J]. Hainan Finance, 2024(02)76-85.

[5] Zhang Yu. On the Realistic Approach to China’s Artificial Intelligence Legislation: A Risk-based Regulatory Model Based on the EU AI Act[J]. Information China, 2025(01)105-107.

[6] Xu Linfang. The EU AI Act and its Implications for China’s Artificial Intelligence Regulation: Based on the Perspective of Risk Classification and Multi-dimensional Coordination[J]. Marketing Management Review, 2025(18)72-74.

[7] Li Yangyang, He Guangxi. EU AI Act: Key Contents, Evaluation and Enlightenment[J]. Scitech in China, 2024(05)5-8.

[8] Zhang Yuan, Qu Jingjing, Zhang Xuanyu. Artificial Intelligence Regulatory Sandbox: Definition, Practices and Inspiration for China[J]. World Sci-Tech R & D, 2025, 47(S1): 54-61.

Downloads

Published

06-11-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

He, J. (2025). Research on the Legislative Path of China’s AI Risk Classification and Full-cycle Regulatory——Based on the Experience of the EU AI Act. Journal of Innovation and Development, 13(1), 373-382. https://doi.org/10.54097/p1dhm702