Intangible Assets and Market Valuation: Rethinking Disclosure in the Digital Economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/sadkjm75Keywords:
Intangible Asset Disclosure, Market Valuation, Accounting Standards.Abstract
In today’s digital economy, the proportion of assets a company holds directly reflects its operating scale and future growth potential. Numerous investors in the market will assess a company’s prospects based on the share of assets that are reflected in its financial statements, thereby determining whether to engage in investment activities. Intangible assets, as one of the most significant components of an enterprise’s assets, undoubtedly constitute a key focus when analyzing a company. However, the requirements for recognizing and disclosing intangible assets under traditional financial reporting frameworks present certain limitations, which will result in a discrepancy between a company’s market valuation and its actual value. Market valuation, as the most tangible measure of a company's worth, directly influences its financing activities and shareholder equity. The discrepancy between market valuation and actual value poses incalculable consequences for a company's future development. Based on this, the present paper focuses on the causal mechanism linking intangible asset disclosure and market valuation, investigating the shortcomings and improvement pathways under current accounting measurement principles and disclosure models. This study first employs an integrated theoretical analysis—encompassing both international and domestic accounting standards, as well as domestic and international theoretical research on intangible assets and market valuation—subsequently draws on a practical corporate case study, and ultimately aims to provide theoretical support and practical guidance for the revision of accounting standards, the formulation of relevant regulatory policies, and investor decision-making.
Downloads
References
[1] World Intellectual Property Organization. New WIPO study gives first-ever figures on value of "intangible capital" in manufactured goods [R]. World Intellectual Property Organization, 2017 - 11 - 20.
[2] LIANG H Y. Practical problems and solutions in the accounting recognition of intangible assets [J]. China Circulation Economy, 2022, (15): 145 - 148.
[3] LI W C. The Critical Analysis of Importance of IAS 38 for Financial Reporting [C]. Proceedings of 2020 International Conference on the Frontiers of Innovative Economics and Management (FIEM 2020): 356 - 359. School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, 2020.
[4] HU J Y. Analysis on the information disclosure of intangible assets of listed companies [J]. New Accounting, 2025, (05): 12 - 16.
[5] Dancaková D, Sopko J, Glova J, et al. The impact of intangible assets on the market value of companies: Cross-sector evidence [J]. Mathematics, 2022, 10 (20): 3819.
[6] Sullivan Jr P H, Sullivan Sr P H. Valuing intangibles companies–An intellectual capital approach [J]. Journal of Intellectual capital, 2000, 1 (4): 328 - 340.
[7] Portela de Lima Rodrigues L M, Oliveira L, Craig R. Applying voluntary disclosure theories to intangibles reporting: Evidence from the Portuguese stock market [J]. Available at SSRN 825764, 2008.
[8] SONG X Y, YANG W H. Alphabet: Innovation Analysis [M]. Wuhan University of Science and Technology; University of York, 2024.
[9] Alphabet Inc. 2024 Annual Report (Form 10-K) [R]. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2024.
[10] MENG D Y. Improvement strategies for intangible asset accounting measurement in the digital economy era [J]. Shanghai Enterprise, 2025, (08): 257 - 259.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

