Analysis of User Accep tance of Residential Intelligence in the Past 20 Years

Authors

  • Jinxiao Cui Tianjin Farragut School, Tianjin, China
  • Jiahang Liu Tianjin Farragut School, Tianjin, China
  • Zichen Xu Tianjin Farragut School, Tianjin, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/tmgbsw81

Keywords:

Residential intelligence; user acceptance; phased evolution; influencing factors.

Abstract

From 2005 to 2024, the global smart home market has achieved a leap from "technological prototype" to "large-scale industrialization", with the market scale increasing from less than 5 billion US dollars to over 150 billion US dollars. However, user adoption behavior has always been restricted by multi-dimensional factors: differences in economic costs lead to the differentiation of product choices among different income groups; the complexity of technical operations reduces the acceptance willingness of the elderly; data privacy risks trigger public trust anxiety; and the regulatory role of social demonstration effects and policy guidance on acceptance has become increasingly prominent. Against this backdrop, systematically sorting out the research evolution of user acceptance of residential intelligence in the past 20 years is of great significance for analyzing the adaptation law between technology diffusion and user needs. Using the literature review method and stage analysis method, this paper divides the research in the past 20 years into three stages: technology-driven stage, social-psychological expansion stage, and value integration stage. It compares the theoretical frameworks (such as the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Diffusion of Innovations Theory, core variables, and empirical conclusions of each stage, analyzes the mechanism of key influencing factors in economic, technical, psychological, and social dimensions, and puts forward targeted suggestions for academic research and industrial practice paths, so as to provide theoretical support for the sustainable development of residential intelligence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Zhou C, Qian Y, Kaner J. A study on smart home use intention of elderly consumers based on technology acceptance models. PLoS ONE, 2024, 19(3): 300-305.

[2] Shuhaiber A, Mashal I. Understanding users' acceptance of smart homes. Technology in Society, 2019, 58(3): 101-110.

[3] Chen C, Xu X, Arpan L. Between the technology acceptance model and sustainable energy technology acceptance model: Investigating smart meter acceptance in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 2017, 25(6): 93-104.

[4] Schill M, Godefroit-Winkel D, Diallo M F, Barbarossa C. Consumers' intentions to purchase smart home objects: Do environmental issues matter? Ecological Economics, 2019, 16(1): 176-185.

[5] Basarir-Ozel B, Turker H B, Nasir V A. Identifying the Key Drivers and Barriers of Smart Home Adoption: A Thematic Analysis from the Business Perspective. Sustainability, 2022, 14(15): 90-95.

[6] Chang S, Nam K. Exploring the sustainable values of smart homes to strengthen adoption. Buildings, 2022, 12(11): 19-29.

[7] Li W, Yigitcanlar T, Erol I, Liu A. Motivations, barriers and risks of smart home adoption: From systematic literature review to conceptual framework. Energy Research & Social Science, 2021, 80(2): 102-121.

[8] Guhr N, Werth O, Blacha P P H, Breitner M H. Privacy concerns in the smart home context. SN Applied Sciences, 2020.

[9] Cannizzaro S, Procter R, Ma S, Maple C. Trust in the smart home: Findings from a nationally representative survey in the UK. PLoS ONE, 2020, 15(5): 231-236.

Downloads

Published

13-03-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Cui, J., Liu, J., & Xu, Z. (2026). Analysis of User Accep tance of Residential Intelligence in the Past 20 Years. Journal of Innovation and Development, 14(3), 421-426. https://doi.org/10.54097/tmgbsw81