Corporate Financial Risk from the Perspective of Financing Structure: Evidence from Sunac China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v19i.11879Keywords:
Financing structure; real estate; financial risk.Abstract
With the rapid development of the real estate economy, the importance of financial risk analysis for the survival and development of enterprises has become increasingly apparent. In addition, it has also attracted many concerns from the academic and industry circles. On this bais, this study initially compiles the sources and sums of money used over the previous five years to develop China's real estate, and extensively searches and organizes China's real estate policies. Taking Sunac China as an example, by analyzing Sunac China's financial statements to judge its financing characteristics and structure, according to research, China's biggest issues with real estate financing are that China's real estate enterprises generally have high debt ratios, single financing models and imperfect systems. Moreover, suggestions are put forward on improving real estate finance legislation and optimizing enterprise management capabilities. It is hoped that these results can provide reference opinions for promoting the diversified development of real estate financing models.
Downloads
References
Han Y, Zhang H, Zhao Y. Structural evolution of real estate industry in China: 2002-2017. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2021, 57: 45–56.
Chiou D, Zhou J, Walters M. The Leverage Game: From Offshore to Onshore. In: Wang B, Just T (eds) Understanding China’s Real Estate Markets. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham 2021.
Yao C Z, Li M J, Xu X. How does bubble risk propagate among financial assets? A perspective from the BSADF-vine copula model. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2023.
Ryzhenkov M. Resource misallocation and manufacturing productivity: The case of Ukraine. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2016, 44(1): 41–55.
Rubio M, Carrasco-Gallego J A. Macroprudential and Monetary Policies: Implications for Financial Stability and Welfare." Journal of Banking & Finance, 2014, 49: 326-36.
Morgan P J, Regis P J, Salike N. Ltv Policy as a Macroprudential Tool and Its Effects on Residential Mortgage Loans. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2019, 37: 89-103S.
De la Horra L P, Javier P, Gabriel de la F. Monetary Policy and Corporate Investment: A Panel-Data Analysis of Transmission Mechanisms in Contexts of High Uncertainty. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2021, 75: 609-624.
Shi S, Jou J, Tripe D. Can Interest Rates Really Control House Prices? Effectiveness and Implications for Macroprudential Policy." Journal of Banking & Finance, 2014, 47: 15-28.
Du Z, Lin Z. Home-Purchase Restriction, Property Tax and Housing Price in China: A Counterfactual Analysis. Journal of Econometrics, 2015, 188(2): 558-68.
Kuttner K N, Ilhyock S. Can Non-Interest Rate Policies Stabilize Housing Markets? Evidence from a Panel of 57 Economies. Journal of Financial Stability, 2016, 26: 31-44.
Zhang L, Xin Y, Han R, et al. Do China's Regulatory Policies Affect Real Estate Enterprise Performance. Available at SSRN 4241755.
Han W, Zhang X, Zheng X. Land Use Regulation and Urban Land Value: Evidence from China. Land Use Policy, 2020, 92: 104432.
Guan H. Financing Risk of Real Estate Enterprises and Its Prevention and Control Measures. Open Journal of Business and Management, 2019, 07(04): 1734–1743.
Apostolou A, Al-Haschimi A, Ricci M. Financial risks in China’s corporate sector: real estate and beyond. Economic Bulletin Articles, 2022, 2.
Zhao L. The financing status and countermeasures of real estate enterprises in China. Modern Marketing, 2012, 6: 161-162.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
