The influence of choice set size and time-lapse accuracy on E-commerce Decision-Making under different product types
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/nmqefq45Keywords:
Choice set size; Time-lapse accuracy; Hedonics; Utilities; E-commerce Decision-Making.Abstract
Previous studies have shown that in the case of time restrictions, consumers can indeed stimulate their willingness to buy. However, there is another important influence on the sale of goods-the size of the selection of goods. The conclusions of previous studies on the size of the selection set have diverged. Some scholars believe that consumers can benefit from a wealth of choices, while others believe that they spend a lot of time and effort and fail to find the satisfaction that meets their needs. Thus, the study began with two main factors, studying the influence of the size and accuracy of the selection set on consumers' choice satisfaction and choice difficulty, and adding common commodity categories: hedonistic products and practical products. The study has conducted 3 pre-experiments and one formal experiment. The main purpose of the pre-experiment is to identify specific hedonistic and practical products. In the main experiment, between-subject design of 2 (large selection set, small selection set) ×2 (milliseconds, seconds) ×2 (hedonics, utilities) was used. A total of 254 students (133 males and 121 females) were randomly assigned to eight groups. The results of the research ultimately showed that consumers had the best choice satisfaction and difficulty in the large choice set-low time elapsed accuracy (seconds) group and the small choice set-high time elapsed precision (milliseconds). For utilities, consumers are more satisfied with their choices at the large selection set (12 pieces) - low time elapsed accuracy (seconds) setting, and less difficult to select at the small choice set (4 pieces) - high time elapsed precision (milliseconds). For hedonists, under the setting of the small choice set (4 pieces) - high time elapsed accuracy (milliseconds), consumers have higher satisfaction with their choice and lower sense of difficulty in choosing.
Downloads
References
Chen, Jun. (2009). Effects of attributional style and time pressure on decision-making information processing. Psychological Science, 32(6), 1445-1447.
Chen, Yanping. (2019). Research on the Mechanism of Choice Set Size on Choice Satisfaction. Master's thesis. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology.
Gao, H. M., Liu, H. W., Zhan, M. J., Fan, M. T., Liang, Z. Y. (2021). A study on the influence of online reviews and product intervention on virtual shopping cart selection decision based on consumer intervention theory. China Management Science, 29(6), 211-222.
Gong, Yanping, Wang, Jiale, and Jiang, Cha. (2020). The effects of time precision and product presentation on consumer product attitudes. Business Economics, 39(5), 104-112.
Hu, W.G., Hu, Y. (2009). The effect of time pressure on framing effects in risky decision making. Psychological Science, 32(3), 694-696.
Jiang, Chengming, Liu, Hongzhi, Cai, Xiaohong, Li, Shu. (2016). A process test of a unidimensional dominance model for cross-period selection. Journal of Psychology, 48(1), 59-72
Li, Y.-W. (2019). The Effects of Choice Set Size and Psychological Distance on Consumption Decisions. Master's thesis. Yantai: Ludong University.
Liu, Lei, Zheng, Yuhuang, and Chen, Rui. (2015). More choices are better? --The effect of choice set size on consumers' diversity seeking. Journal of Psychology, 47(1), 66-78.
Liu, T., Ma, J. W., Li, X., Chen, Y. W.. (2017). The effects of choice set size on attitudes and behaviors in online shopping decision-making. Psychological Science, 40(2), 463-470.
Lu Shuang. (2020). The Effect of Time Passage Precision of Limited Time Promotion on Consumers' Online Impulsive Purchases. Master's thesis. Xiamen: Huaqiao University.
Ma Jingjing, Ma Xinxin, Zhang Li. (2008). Different Preferences for Practical and Hedonic Products in Choice and Abandonment: The Examples of Computer CDs and Music CDs. Journal of Marketing Science, 4(1), 107-119.
Tong, Luqiong. (2012). A study on the effects of money and time concepts on consumers' hedonic and practical product choices. Doctoral dissertation. Beijing: Tsinghua University.
Wang Shijian, Wang Liangyan. (2016). More choices may not necessarily consume more - a product type-based perspective. Shanghai Management Science, 38(1), 24-30.
XI Kaiyuan, WANG Xin, LIANG Hao. (2019). The effect of accuracy of online promotional countdown on consumers' purchase intention. Economy and Management, 33(5), 75-79.
Xie, Chenlan, Yeh, Yihu, Zhang, Zhicong. (2020). The effects of temporal distance and level of explanation on willingness and likelihood to donate. Psychological Research, 13(2), 162-167.
Xu, Y.. (2021). A study on the formation mechanism of consumer preferences for real and hedonic goods under the influence of social exclusion. Doctoral dissertation. Jilin: Jilin University.
Zhu Hui. (2014). Research on the Relationship between Impulsive Buying Behavior and Customers' Post-Purchase Satisfaction. Master's thesis. Lanzhou: Lanzhou Business School.
Beatty, S. E., & Ferrell, M. E. (1998). Impulse buying: Modeling its precursors. Journal of Retailing, 74(2), 169-191.
Botti, S., & Lyengar, S. S. (2004). The psychological pleasure and pain of choosing: when people prefer choosing at the cost of subsequent outcome satisfaction. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 87(3), 312.
Chernev, A. (2005). Feature Complementarity and Assortment in Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 748-759.
Chernev, A. (2006). Decision Focus and Consumer Choice among Assortments. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 50-59.
Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer Choice Between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 60-71.
Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 79(6), 995-1006.
Kuksov, D., & Villas-Boas, J. M. (2010). When More Alternatives Lead to Less Choice. Marketing Science, 3(29), 507-524.
Kwon, H. H., & Armstrong, K. L. (2002a). Factors influencing impulse buying of sport team licensed merchandise. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 11(3), 151-163.
Lewis, P. A., & Miall, R. C. (2009). The precision of temporal judgment: milliseconds, many minutes, and beyond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1525), 1897-1905.
Okada, E. M. (2005). Justification effects on consumer choice of hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(1), 43-53.
Reutskaja, E., & Hogarth, R. M. (2010). Satisfaction in choice as a function of the number of alternatives: When "goods satiate". Psychology & Marketing, 26(3), 197-204.
Sackett, A. M., Meyvis, T., Nelson, L. D., Converse, B. A., & Sackett, A. L. (2010). You're Having Fun When Time Flies. Psychological Science, 21, 111-117.
Sela, A., Berger, J., & Liu, W. (2009). Variety, vice, and virtue: How assortment size influences option choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 941-951.
Schwartz, B. (2012). The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less. P.alinley & Sjoseph Positive Psychology in Practice, 17(32), 143-150.
Shah, A. M., & Wolford, G. (2007). Buying Behavior as a Function of Parametric Variation of Number of Choices. Psychological Science, 18(5), 369-370.
Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 310-320.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






