Board Faultline and Corporate Fraud

Authors

  • Xue Qiu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/kxzwgz49

Keywords:

board faultlines, corporate fraud, environmental uncertainty, ownership concentration.

Abstract

Drawing on data analysis of Chinese A-share listed companies between 2011 and 2022, this paper examines how board faultlines affect corporate fraud. The results indicate that: (1) board faultlines have a significant inhibiting effect on corporate fraud and impede corporate fraud involving different levels of punishment; (2) A high level of environmental uncertainty can improve the cohesion of the board team. But when the first largest shareholder is in absolute control of the enterprise, the influence of the board Faultline is weakened.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lau D C, Murnighan J K. Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups [J]. Academy of management review, 1998, 23 (2): 325 - 340.

Bezrukova K, Jehn K A, Zanutto E L, et al. Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance[J]. Organization science, 2009, 20 (1): 35 - 50.

Cronin M A, Bezrukova K, Weingart L R, et al. Subgroups within a team: The role of cognitive and affective integration [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2011, 32 (6): 831 - 849.

Cull R, Xu L C. Institutions, ownership, and finance: the determinants of profit reinvestment among Chinese firms [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2005, 77 (1): 117 - 146.

Thatcher S M B, Jehn K A, Zanutto E. Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance [J]. Group decision and Negotiation, 2003, 12: 217 - 241.

Ghosh D, Olsen L. Environmental uncertainty and managers’ use of discretionary accruals [J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2009, 34 (2): 188 - 205.

Downloads

Published

18-07-2024

How to Cite

Qiu, X. (2024). Board Faultline and Corporate Fraud. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 37, 563-569. https://doi.org/10.54097/kxzwgz49