Market Dynamics of Short Covering: The Price Rebound Phenomenon and Double Peak Model in China’s Futures

Authors

  • Mingkai Gong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/f5fyjj86

Keywords:

Double peak model; Futures market; Price Discovery.

Abstract

The present study examines the behavior of futures markets in the wake of widespread short selling and subsequent short covering, which frequently lead to notable price increases. Known as the "Double Peak Model," this study provides a thorough analysis by synthesizing empirical data and recent literature. Data on futures contracts for different financial indices and commodities during periods of notable short interest and subsequent short covering are gathered for the study. Using statistical and econometric methods, the research examines trends in price movements and volatility. Key findings show that while short covering can result in sudden and sharp price increases, short selling can improve market efficiency and transparency by improving information flow. The study also emphasizes how crucial institutional involvement, legal frameworks, and market dynamics are in determining these price fluctuations. The Double Peak Model provides a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying market behaviors related to short selling and covering, which is useful information for traders, investors, and policymakers. These understandings are essential for creating sensible regulatory policies, enhancing risk management, and creating successful trading strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Boehmer, E., Huszár, Z. R., & Jordan, B. D. (2021). The good news in short interest. Journal of Financial Economics, 141(1), 128-153.

[2] Blau, B. M., & Whitby, R. J. (2018). Short selling and stock price crash risk. Journal of Financial Markets, 39, 52-70.

[3] De Ridder, A., & Ringgenberg, M. (2017). Trading failure and stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 124(1), 172-193.

[4] Saffi, P. A., & Sigurdsson, K. (2017). Price efficiency and short selling. The Review of Financial Studies, 34(1), 261-292.

[5] Boehmer, E., & Wu, J. (2018). Short selling and the price discovery process. The Review of Financial Studies, 31(7), 2875-2906.

[6] Chen, J., & Singal, V. (2019). Short sales and speed of price adjustment: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Financial Markets, 46, 100520.

[7] Blau, B. M., & Wade, C. (2018). Short selling and stock price synchronicity. Journal of Financial Markets, 37, 42-59.

[8] Massa, M., Zhang, L., & Zhang, H. (2020). Stock price synchronicity, crash risk, and institutional investors. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 55(1), 137-167.

[9] Boehmer, E., Jones, C. M., & Zhang, X. (2018). Shackling short sellers: The 2008 shorting ban. The Review of Financial Studies, 31(8), 3130-3156.

[10] Duan, Y., Hu, G., & McLean, R. D. (2020). "Costly arbitrage and idiosyncratic risk: Evidence from short sellers." Journal of Financial Economics, 135(1), 108-129.

[11] Hanson, S. G., & Sunderam, A. (2021). "Are there too many safe assets? Securitization and the incentives for information production." Journal of Financial Economics, 141(2), 389-407.

Downloads

Published

05-12-2024

How to Cite

Gong, M. (2024). Market Dynamics of Short Covering: The Price Rebound Phenomenon and Double Peak Model in China’s Futures. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 43, 166-172. https://doi.org/10.54097/f5fyjj86