Enterprise Ecological Strategic Investment Under the New Situation of Global Economy Take Xiaomi Group as an example
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/xw1sza41Keywords:
Ecological strategic investment; Xiaomi; CVC; IoT; ecological chain investing; business operation.Abstract
In recent years, great changes have taken place in the international political and economic situation. Many enterprises are affected by the overall economic environment and face many risks and worries in enterprise operation and corporate governance. Not only that, many medium-sized and large enterprises are also facing new challenges in industrial upgrading and consumer goods manufacturing reform. This study mainly focuses on the corporate ecological strategic investment under the development and change of global economic environment in recent years. The author chooses Xiaomi as a case company, analyzes its deployment and benefits of ecological strategic investment, and summarizes the plan suitable for the current enterprise strategic investment. These programs can help enterprises improve their core competitiveness, so as to present a stable operating situation in the rapidly changing market environment.
Downloads
References
[1] Moore J F. Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition[J]. Harvard business review,1993,71(3):75-86.
[2] Moore, James F. (1996): The death of competition: leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems, Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
[3] Culot, G., Orzes, G., Sartor, M., & Nassimbeni, G. (2020). The future of manufacturing: A Delphi-based scenario analysis on Industry 4.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, 120092.
[4] Ruiz-Alba, J., Soares, A., Rodríguez-Molina, M., & Frías, D. (2016). Servitization and co-creation: Customers’ perspective. In Center for Business & Industrial Marketing (Eds.), CBIM 2016 Academic workshop: Extending value through product, service and platform Innovations.
[5] Iansiti, M; Levien,R.The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability; Harvard Business School Press:Boston,MA,USA,2004;pp.68–72,221–224.
[6] Paasi, J., Wiman, H., Apilo, T., Valkokari, K., 2023. Modeling the dynamics of innovation ecosystems. Int. J. Innov. Stud. 7 (2), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijis.2022.1 2.002.
[7] Lin, X., Liu, B., Han, J., Chen, X., 2018. Industrial upgrading based on global innovation chains: a case study of Huawei technologies Co., Ltd. Shenzhen. Int. J. Innov. Stud. 2 (3), 81–90.
[8] Neumeyer, X., Santos, S.C., 2018. Sustainable business models, venture typologies, and entrepreneurial ecosystems: a social network perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 172, 4565–4579.
[9] Teece, D. J.; Pisano, G.; Shuen, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic Management.Strateg.Manag.J.1997,18,509–533.
[10] Ritala, P., & Almpanopoulou, A. (2017). In defense of ‘eco’ in innovation ecosystem. Technovation, 60, 39–42.
[11] Barabasi, A. L. (2002). Linked: The new science of networks. Cambridge, MA, Perseus Publishing.
[12] Borgatti, S. P. and P. C. Foster (2003). "The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology." Journal of Management 29(6): 991-1013.
[13] Altman, E.J., Nagle, F., Tushman, M.L., 2022. The translucent hand of managed ecosystems: engaging communities for value creation and capture. Acad. Manag. Ann. 16 (1), 70–101.
[14] Couzineau-Zegwaard, E., Meier, O., Barabel, M., 201 2. Business ecosystem model applied to the electric vehicle market. In: 26th Electric Vehicle Symposium, vol. 2, pp. 938–945, 2012.
[15] Demir F.,2009: Financial Liberalization, Private Investment and Portfolio Choice: Financialization of Real Sectors in Emerging Markets, Journal of Development Economics, Vol.88,No.2.
[16] [16] https://ir.mi.com/zh-hans
[17] [17] https://ir.mi.com/zh-hans/financial-information/annual-interim-reports
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
