Current Research Progress of ESG and Its Systematic Analysis from the Perspective of Economics

Danning Sun

doi:10.54097/s1wkf910

Authors

Danning Sun

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/s1wkf910

Keywords:

Environment, economic perspective, sustainable development.

Abstract

As global environmental, social and governance issues gradually become key factors for enterprise sustainable development and investment decision-making, the research progress of Environment, Social Responsibility and Governance (ESG) has received wide attention. This article will systematically summarize the existing ESG research based on the existing ESG research environment, society and governance, based on the existing research on ESG enterprise value, corporate performance and social responsibility, systematically summarize the existing ESG research, find problems in ESG research and propose solutions through summary. The construction of ESG system in accordance with economics is discussed, and the research found that, The ESG system provides new evaluation indicators and decision-making tools for enterprises and investors. By quantifying the performance of the environment, society and governance, ESG evaluation not only helps enterprises better internalize social costs, improve brand value and employee loyalty, but also alleviates information asymmetry and agency problems, and enhances the long-term risk resistance of enterprises. Based on the discussion of the ESG system in this article, it provides a program discussion to solve the problems in the current ESG research. At the same time, it provides more possibilities for better achieving the coordinated development of society, economy and the environment, and provides a feasibility plan for global sustainable development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] World Bank Group. Who Cares Wins: Connecting financial markets to a changing world. Research Documents form Word Bank, 2017.

[2] Yuan Yehu, Xiong Xiaohan. Research on the relationship between ESG performance and enterprise performance of listed companies - the adjustment effect based on media attention. Jiangxi Social Science, 2021, 41 (10): 68-77.

[3] Fafaliou I, Giaka M, Konstantios D, et al. Firms' ESG reputational risk and market longevity: A firm-leve analysis for the United States. Journal of Business Research, 2022 (149): 161-177.

[4] Qiu Muyuan, Yin Hong. ESG performance and financing cost of enterprises under the background of ecological civilization construction. Quantitative Economic Technology Economic Research, 2019, 36 (03): 108-123.

[5] Yang Dongning, Zhou Changhui. Dynamic relationship model of enterprise environmental performance and economic performance. China's Industrial Economy, 2004, (04): 43-50.

[6] Li Weiyang, Xiao Hongjun. Research on Corporate Social Responsibility from the Perspective of Optimizing the Allocation of Social Resources. China's Industrial Economy, 2009, (04): 116-126.

[7] Li Wei'an, Zhang Yaowei, Zheng Minna, etc. Research on Green Governance and Its Evaluation of Listed Companies in China. Management World, 2019, 35 (05): 126-133+160.

[8] Zhang Lin, Zhao Haitao. Does the performance of enterprise environment, society and corporate governance (ESG) affect the value of enterprises? - Empirical research based on A-share listed companies. Wuhan Finance, 2019, (10): 36-43

[9] Li Jinglin, Yang Zhen, Chen Jin, etc. Research on the mechanism of ESG to promote enterprise performance - based on the perspective of enterprise innovation. Science and Technology Management, 2021, 42 (09): 71-89.

[10] Zhang Jiping, Li Zengfu. The responsibilities and responsibilities of enterprises in the supply chain network center - a study based on the ESG perspective. Foreign Economy and Management, 2024, 1: 1-17.

[11] Xu Qian. Research on the construction of financial environment, society and governance (ESG) system. Financial Supervision Research, 2019, (04): 95-111.