A Study on Global Climate Mitigation and National Resource Management Based on the Green GDP Accounting Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hhp5j290Keywords:
Green GDP (GGDP), Climate Change Mitigation, Environmental Economics, Sustainable Developmen, Carbon Emissions and Resource Management.Abstract
This article investigates the potential of Green GDP (GGDP) to replace conventional GDP as a global economic metric. By accounting for environmental degradation and natural resource depletion—factors typically excluded from traditional GDP calculations—GGDP offers a more comprehensive measure of long-term economic performance. Utilizing a linear regression model, this study examines the relationship between economic activity and climate change, with a focus on carbon emissions and water consumption. The findings reveal an inverse correlation between GGDP and rising global temperatures, suggesting GGDP’s potential to mitigate climate change by integrating the environmental costs of economic growth. A case study of China further illustrates how adopting GGDP could lead to improvements in air quality, more efficient resource management, and alignment with the country’s environmental objectives, including its commitments under the Paris Agreement. Although the transition from GDP to GGDP may face resistance, particularly in nations heavily reliant on fossil fuel consumption and resource exploitation are significant. This study underscores the necessity of incorporating environmental considerations into economic evaluations to foster a sustainable future, where economic growth can be achieved in harmony with ecological preservation. GGDP thus provides a more holistic and sustainable framework for assessing global economic performance.
Downloads
References
[1] Sen, A., Fitoussi, J. P., & Stiglitz, J. E. Mismeasuring Our Lives: Why GDP Doesn't Add Up [M]. New York: The New Press, 2010 [2024-09-22].
[2] Cheng, H. F., Li, Y. X., & Cao, M. Y. How can carbon reduction and growth be achieved simultaneously?—An empirical study based on the new energy demonstration city policy [J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2024, 50 (07): 126-140.
[3] Li, H. T. Research and countermeasures on the optimal allocation of different types of water resources [J]. Agriculture & Technology, 2024, 44 (13): 98-101.
[4] Chen, Z. Y. Analysis of optimal water resource allocation under the strictest water resource management system[J]. Shaanxi Water Resources, 2024, (06): 33-36.
[5] Wang, F., Wang, R., & Wang, J. Measurement of China's green GDP and its dynamic variation based on industrial perspective [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 (35): 43813-43828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10236-x
[6] Jägermeyr, J., Müller, C., Ruane, A. C., et al. Climate impacts on global agriculture emerge earlier in new generation of climate and crop models [J]. Nature Food, 2021, 2 (11): 873-885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00400-y
[7] Lu, K. H. Smog in China closes schools and construction sites, cuts traffic in Beijing [EB/OL]. CNN, 2015-12-07 [2024-09-22].
[8] Zhou, F. X. Analysis of the responsibility dilemma of local governments in environmental governance [D]. East China University of Political Science and Law, 2020.
[9] Xu, J. Y. Establishment and analysis of the Green GDP accounting model in the data context [J]. Bohai Rim Economic Outlook, 2024, (04): 59-62.
[10] Zheng B, Ding X, Liu K. The Construction of Linear Regression Model Based on the Index Evaluation Method to Account Green GDP [C] // Wuhan Zhicheng Times Cultural Development Co., Ltd.. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Economic Administration and Information Systems (EAIS 2023). Department of Beijing Foreign Studies University; 2023: 9.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






