Can ESG ratings promote corporate greening? --Validation based on the double difference method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/77x4db39Keywords:
ESG rating; green transition; multi-temporal double difference model.Abstract
Drawing on comprehensive data from China’s A-share listed companies over the 2009 to 2021 period, this study utilizes a multi-period difference-in-differences (DiD) model to investigate corporate green transformation in detail. This approach is innovative in its use of green patent licenses and core green licenses as primary indicators, chosen to accurately assess the degree of transformation in environmental sustainability initiatives. The analysis reveals that the introduction of ESG ratings exerts a significant positive influence on corporate green development, as reflected in marked improvements in these green indicators after ESG ratings are adopted. Such findings underscore the important role of ESG ratings in driving sustainable business practices and provide robust evidence that ESG mechanisms are essential in promoting green transformation across enterprises. Based on these insights, it is recommended that governmental bodies intensify the promotion and implementation of green financial policies, which would offer more substantial policy backing for enterprises striving toward green and sustainable growth.
Downloads
References
[1] Fang X, Hu D. Corporate ESG performance and innovation-evidence from A-share listed companies[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2023, 2: 91-106.
[2] Wen S, Liu H, Wang H. Green finance, green innovation, and high-quality economic development[J]. J Financ Res, 2022, 8: 1-17.
[3] Chen G, Ding S, Zhao X, Jiang X. China's Green Finance Policy, Financing Costs and Green Transformation of Enterprises: Based on the Central Bank's Collateral Policy Perspective. Financial Research, 2021, 12: 75-95.
[4] Yu L, Zhang W. Study on the Forcing Effect of Environmental Taxes on Enterprises' Green Transformation. China Population-Resources and Environment, 2019, 29(7): 112-120.
[5] Li H, Liu Q, Li S, Fu S. Environmental, social and governance disclosure and corporate green innovation performance. Statistical Research, 2022, 39(12): 38-54.
[6] Liu, B., Lu, J. R., Ju, T. Formalism or Substantivism: A Study of Green Innovation under ESG Rating Soft Regulation. Nankai Management Review, 2023, 1-24.
[7] Wu C, Chen S. Green transformation and high-quality development under ESG system with Chinese characteristics. New Finance, 2022, 4: 8-16.
[8] Lins K.V., Servaes H., Tamayo A. Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance, The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis. Journal of Finance, 2017, 72 (4), 1785-1824.
[9] Pástor L., Stambaugh R.F., Taylor L.A. Sustainable Investing in Equilibrium, Journal of Financial Economics, 2021, 142 (2), 550-571.
[10] Goss A., Roberts G. S. The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Cost of Bank Loans. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2011, 35 (7), 1794-1810.
[11] Hu J, Han Y, Yong Z. How corporate digital transformation affects corporate ESG performance - Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Industrial Economics Review, 2023, (1):105-123.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Business, Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






