An Analysis of The Influence of Public Opinion on Legislation and Justice: To Keep the Bottom Line and Maintain an Objective and Impartial Attitude

Abstract

With the rapid development of the Internet, the era of information explosion has quietly arrived, and the channels for people to express their opinions and freedom of expression have been gradually broadened, but problems have also quietly arrived. People's dissatisfaction and anger about legislative bills on various social media platforms, even taking to the streets and demonstrating in public; the media are leading public opinion in a crime article, conducting media trials, constantly interfering with the judiciary, making the public doubt and criticize the impartiality and authority of the judiciary. This paper analyzes some cases in both judicial and legislative fields to explore the need for public opinion and judicial legislation to establish a harmonious and effective relationship so that they can give full play to their responsibilities and obligations in their respective fields. Ultimately, the media should play the role of monitoring and timely spreading public opinion and should reflect the principle of impartiality and objectivity in their reports, rather than inciting public opinion or reporting with biased opinions; while the legislature should fully protect the lives and property of the people when legislating or amending the constitution, and the law is to serve the people, not to facilitate the independent existence of some classes; in the process of judicial decisions, the judicial In the process of judicial decision, the justice and rigor of the judiciary should be maintained, and the decision should be made according to the law, not entirely based on public opinion, and the independence and justice of the judiciary should be maintained while avoiding controversies as much as possible.