Analysis of the Principle and State-of-art Artificial Heart Valve Facilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/g9ehrh44Keywords:
Mechanical artificial hearts; mitral; aortic valves; aorta bioprosthetic valve.Abstract
In recent years, the mechanical artificial hearts are widely used in surgery ought to the medical demands. Although the use of mechanical artificial hearts is widespread worldwide and has been clinically proven for many years, current technology is still not sufficient to permanently preserve the heart. With current technology, reliable recovery after transplantation cannot be achieved and patients must continue to struggle to maintain heart function. Valves are therefore the main cause of artificial heart failure, and the choice of valve type is time-consuming. On this basis, this study will discuss the principle as well as the state-of-art facilities of heart valve. According to the analysis, valves, especially mitral and aortic valves (bioprosthetic and purely mechanical), can be further developed and their advantages and disadvantages are obvious. In addition, the limitations as well as the prospects for the devices are discussed accordingly. Overall, these results shed light on guiding further exploration of artificial heart valve development.
Downloads
References
Bavo A M, Rocatello G, Iannaccone F, et al. Fluid-structure interaction simulation of prosthetic aortic valves: comparison between immersed boundary and arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian techniques for the mesh representation. PloS one, 2016, 11(4): e0154517.
Narain M, Bushra S R, Francis C. Wells, Operative Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Surgery. Nature 2018, 978: 70-99.
Asher C R, Griffin B P. Manual of Valvular Heart Disease. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (LWW), 2017, 978: 141-154.
Luraghi G, Wu W, De Gaetano F, et al. Evaluation of an aortic valve prosthesis: Fluid-structure interaction or structural simulation. Journal of biomechanics, 2017, 58: 45-51.
Jiang W, Zhou C, Guo H. Rational selection of mechanical and biologic valves. Chinese Clinical Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2015, 22(4): 361-365.
Paradis J M, Del Trigo M, Puri R, et al. Transcatheter valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring for treating aortic and mitral surgical prosthetic dysfunction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2015, 66(18): 2019-2037.
Rodriguez-Gabella T, Voisine P, Puri R, et al. Aortic bioprosthetic valve durability: incidence, mechanisms, predictors, and management of surgical and transcatheter valve degeneration. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2017, 70(8): 1013-1028.
Barbanti M, Costa G, Zappulla P, et al. Incidence of long‐term structural valve dysfunction and bioprosthetic valve failure after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018, 7(15): e008440.
Karangelis D, Mazine A, Roubelakis A et al. What is the role of sutureless aortic valves in today’s armamentarium. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, 2017, 15(2): 83-91.
Côté N, Pibarot P, Clavel M A. Incidence, risk factors, clinical impact, and management of bioprosthesis structural valve degeneration. Current Opinion in Cardiology, 2017, 32(2): 123-129.
Sachdev S, Bardia N, Nguyen L, et al. Bioprosthetic valve thrombosis. Cardiology Research, 2018, 9(6): 335.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
