Analysis Of Factors Affecting Bird Identification Mechanisms and Suggestions for Environmental Protection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/6xbyc887Keywords:
Individual recognition, Visual signaling, Acoustic communication, Environmental protection.Abstract
Recognition, happening between species, kin, neighbors, and mates, is the basis of most animal interactions such as mating, food provisioning, and territory protection. The identification accuracy of conspecifics is facilitated by some factors but impeded by others, such as the cost of acquiring and memorizing social information. Avians primarily use vocal and visual identity signals to recognize other individuals, such as the general song characteristics or spot patterns on the feathers. By analyzing the identification context, signature production, and signal perception and response, the article reviews recent works to recommend environmental conservation approaches from the perspective of bird identification. Factors including sex, behavioral context, vocalization types, distance, and cognitive cost are demonstrated in their influence on recognition, and the lack of research on visual recognition does not indicate the more adaptive and complex nature of vocal recognition. Furthermore, the review encourages reducing anthropogenic effects on noise, light, and climate; avoiding behavioral disturbance; and restoring natural habitats. The review provides insights into the current state of individual animal recognition research by organizing the main findings of recent studies.
Downloads
References
Trapp, R., & Fernández-Juricic, E. (2022). How visual system configuration can play a role in individual recognition: A visual modeling study. Animal Cognition, 25(1), 205–216.
Tumulty, J. P., & Sheehan, M. J. (2020). What Drives Diversity in Social Recognition Mechanisms? Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7.
Sheehan, M. J., & Bergman, T. J. (2016). Is there an evolutionary trade-off between quality signaling and social recognition? Behavioral Ecology, 27(1), 2–13.
Elie, J. E., & Theunissen, F. E. (2018). Zebra finches identify individuals using vocal signatures unique to each call type. Nature Communications, 9(1), Article 1.
Mates, E. A., Tarter, R. R., Ha, J. C., Clark, A. B., & McGowan, K. J. (2015). Acoustic profiling in a complexly social species, the American crow: Caws encode information on caller sex, identity and behavioural context. Bioacoustics, 24(1), 63–80.
Yorzinski, J. L. (2017). The cognitive basis of individual recognition. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 16, 53–57.
Mouterde, S. C., Theunissen, F. E., Elie, J. E., Vignal, C., & Mathevon, N. (2014). Acoustic communication and sound degradation: How do the individual signatures of male and female zebra finch calls transmit over distance? PloS One, 9(7), e102842.
Curé, C., Mathevon, N., & Aubin, T. (2016). Mate vocal recognition in the Scopoli’s shearwater Calonectris diomedea: Do females and males share the same acoustic code? Behavioural Processes, 128, 96–102.
Linhart, P., & Šálek, M. (2017). The assessment of biases in the acoustic discrimination of individuals. PLOS ONE, 12(5), e0177206.
Benti, B., Curé, C., & Dufour, V. (2019). Individual signature in the most common and context-independent call of the Rook (Corvus frugilegus). The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 131(2), 373–381.
Průchová, A., Jaška, P., & Linhart, P. (2017). Cues to individual identity in songs of songbirds: Testing general song characteristics in Chiffchaffs Phylloscopus collybita. Journal of Ornithology, 158(4), 911–924.
Mouterde, S. C., Elie, J. E., Mathevon, N., & Theunissen, F. E. (2017). Single Neurons in the Avian Auditory Cortex Encode Individual Identity and Propagation Distance in Naturally Degraded Communication Calls. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 37(13), 3491–3510.
Baciadonna, L., Solvi, C., La Cava, S., Pilenga, C., Gamba, M., & Favaro, L. (2021). Cross-modal individual recognition in the African penguin and the effect of partnership. Proceedings. Biological Sciences, 288(1960), 20211463.
Brecht, K. F., Wagener, L., Ostojić, L., Clayton, N. S., & Nieder, A. (2017). Comparing the face inversion effect in crows and humans. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 203(12), 1017–1027.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







