Drawback and Improvements of Current Perovskite Solar Cells

Authors

  • Junhan Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/0vg7sw59

Keywords:

Interfaces, toxicity, perovskites, solar cells, stability.

Abstract

The concept of "sustainable solar cells" encompasses the dual objectives of promoting human health and advancing sustainable societal progress. Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have garnered significant attention over the years as promising contenders, recently reaching power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) exceeding 25%. Nonetheless, a majority of the primary materials in PSC production are recognized as hazardous by multiple environmental bodies. While there have been initial efforts, both chemically and physically, to develop less toxic PSCs, the PCE of these environmentally-friendly variants remains subpar when compared to their traditional counterparts. Hence, the balance between toxicity and efficiency has emerged as a pivotal concern for the PSC market. Viewing this through a lens of sustainability, it becomes evident why PSCs have become a dominant choice for sustainable solar technology. The subsequent focus should be on addressing the limitations—mainly toxicity and stability—associated with PSCs. The toxicity inherent in PSCs is largely attributed to the inclusion of heavy metals, such as lead, and halogens in its molecular composition. Concurrently, stability issues stand as significant barriers to the large-scale manufacturing of PSCs. Thus, pinpointing the equilibrium between toxicity and efficiency is vital for the successful market integration of PSCs. Finally, potential solutions to mitigate these shortcomings will be outlined.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Li H., Zhang W., Perovskite tandem solar cells: From fundamentals to commercial deployment. Chemical Reviews, 2020, 120 (18): 9835 – 9950.

Ding G., Zheng Y., Xiao X., et al., Sustainable development of perovskite solar cells: Keeping a balance between toxicity and efficiency. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2022, 10 (15): 8159 - 8171.

Li X., Zhang F., He H., et al., On-device lead sequestration for perovskite solar cells. Nature, 2020, 578 (7796): 555 – 558.

Li Z., Zhao Y., Wang X., et al., Cost analysis of perovskite tandem photovoltaics. Joule, 2018, 2 (8): 1559 – 1572.

Chen Q., The King of the New Generation Photovoltaic Technologies—Perovskite Solar Cells & the Opportunities and Challenges. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, 926 (1).

Liu Y., Lang F., Dittrich T., et al., Enhancement of photocurrent in an ultra-thin perovskite solar cell by Ag nanoparticles deposited at low temperature. RSC Advances, 2017, 7 (3): 1206 – 1214.

Niu G., Guo X., Wang L., Review of recent progress in chemical stability of perovskite solar cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015, 3 (17): 8970 – 8980.

Frost J.M., Butler K.T., Brivio F., et al., Atomistic origins of high-performance in hybrid halide perovskite solar cells. Nano Letters, 2014, 14 (5): 2584 – 2590.

Yang J., Siempelkamp B.D., Liu, D., Kelly T.L., Investigation of ch3nh3pbi3 degradation rates and mechanisms in controlled humidity environments using in situ techniques. ACS Nano, 2015, 9 (2): 1955 – 1963.

Frost J.M., Butler K.T., Brivio F., et al., Atomistic origins of high-performance in hybrid halide perovskite solar cells, Nano Lett., 2014, 14: 2584 - 2590.

Downloads

Published

27-02-2024

How to Cite

Wang, J. (2024). Drawback and Improvements of Current Perovskite Solar Cells. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 83, 501-507. https://doi.org/10.54097/0vg7sw59