Navigating the Path to Responsible AI: Interpretable Models and Ethical Implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/bz5w2p29Keywords:
Responsible AI, interpretable models, ethical implications.Abstract
In the realm of responsible AI development, this study undertakes a thorough exploration of interpretable and transparent deep learning models, recognizing their pivotal importance in shaping the future of artificial intelligence. It rigorously investigates a broad spectrum of strategies, ranging from fundamental feature visualization and extraction techniques to advanced methods such as Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), Explainable AI (XAI) tools like SHAP and Integrated Gradients, and inherently interpretable architectures like decision networks. These multifaceted approaches collectively serve to demystify the inner workings of complex AI models, providing invaluable insights into their decision-making processes. Furthermore, this research extends its purview to encompass the ethical dimensions of AI, elevating its significance beyond technical prowess. It places a resolute emphasis on addressing bias mitigation and ensuring fairness, establishing robust mechanisms for accountability and transparency, conducting rigorous analyses of societal impacts, and bolstering data privacy and security protocols. These ethical considerations are recognized as critical pillars in the foundation of responsible AI development, with the potential to build and maintain public trust in AI technologies while simultaneously aligning these innovations with the values and expectations of society at large.
Downloads
References
Ramprasaath R. Selvaraju, Mohan Cogswell, Abhishek Das et al. Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV 2017), 2017, 618 - 626.
Johannes S. Fischer. Class Activation Maps. Retrieved from: johfischer.com/2022/01/27/class-activation-maps/, 2022.
Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. Anchors: High-Precision Model-Agnostic Explanations. In Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2018), 2018, 1527 – 1535.
Rich Caruana, Yin Lou, Johannes Gehrke et al. Intelligible models for healthcare: Predicting pneumonia risk and hospital 30-day readmission. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2015), 2015, 1721 - 1730.
Fernando Lòpez. Shap: Shapley Additive Explanations. Medium, Towards Data Science. Retrieved from: towardsdatascience.com/shap-shapley-additive-explanations-5a2a271ed9c3, 2021.
Scott M. Lundberg and Su-In Lee. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2017), 2017, 4765 - 4774.
Jiajun Chen, Le Song, Martin J. Wainwright, and Michael I. Jordan. Learning to explain: An information-theoretic perspective on model interpretation. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2018), 2018, 80: 883 - 892.
Nicholas Diakopoulos. Algorithmic Accountability: A Primer. Data & Society Research Institute, 2016.
Moritz Hardt, Eric Price, and Nathan Srebro. Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2016.
Alexandra Chouldechova. Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments. 2017, 5 (2): 153 - 163.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







