Research On Compliance Risk Identification and Prevention Mechanism of Enterprises in The ESG Field
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/r5jqwk85Keywords:
Corporate, ESG, Compliance Risk, Jurisprudential Perspective, Preventive Mechanisms.Abstract
With the continuous progress of the global society and the enhancement of the awareness of corporate responsibility, environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues have become the core considerations for the sustainable development of enterprises. This paper provides an in-depth study of corporate compliance risks in ESG from a legal perspective. By integrating the theories of jurisprudence, management and risk management, it systematically analyses the legal framework, regulatory trends and relevant standards of ESG compliance, and explores the challenges and opportunities for corporations in this area. This paper not only expands the research field of corporate legal management, but also provides jurisprudence support for the sustainable development of enterprises, and calls on enterprises to establish a comprehensive risk awareness in ESG compliance, actively respond to challenges, and contribute to global social responsibility.
Downloads
References
Gadinis S, Miazad A. Corporate law and social risk [J]. Vand. L. Rev., 2020, 73: 1401.
Sulkowski A, Jebe R. Evolving ESG Reporting Governance, Regime Theory, and Proactive Law: Predictions and Strategies [J]. American Business Law Journal, 2022, 59(3): 449-503.
He X, Jing Q, Chen H. The impact of environmental tax laws on heavy-polluting enterprise ESG performance: A stakeholder behavior perspective [J]. Journal of environmental management, 2023, 344: 118578.
Hazen T L. Social Issues in the Spotlight: The Increasing Need to Improve Publicly Held Companies' CSR and ESG Disclosures [J]. U. Pa. J. Bus. L., 2020, 23: 740.
Kosorukova I, Tereshchenko O, de Velazco J J H G, et al. Development of an Entrepreneurial Start-Up Ecosystem: Socio-Economic and Legal Factors Influencing the Achievement of ESG Principles (Case of Asian Countries) [J]. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 2023, 11(4): e555-e555.
Razak M U A, Zahari W Z W, Razak A M A, et al. The legal framework of shareholders activism in Malaysia in promoting environmental, sustainability and governance (ESG)[J]. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 2021, 6(16): 203-208.
Yeoh P. Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Laws, Regulations and Practices in the Digital Era[J]. Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Laws, Regulations and Practices in the Digital Era, 2022: 1-424.
Buallay A M. The level of sustainability reporting and its impact on firm performance: the moderating role of a country’s sustainability reporting law [D]. Brunel University London, 2020.
Chouaibi S, Affes H. The effect of social and ethical practices on environmental disclosure: evidence from an international ESG data [J]. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 2021, 21(7): 1293-1317.
Tylec A. ESG reporting framework in Poland–the current state of affairs and perspectives [J]. Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie/Politechnika Śląska, 2022.
Lu J, Wang J. Corporate governance, law, culture, environmental performance and CSR disclosure: A global perspective [J]. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 2021, 70: 101264.
Chen L, Yuan T, Cebula R J, et al. Fulfillment of ESG responsibilities and firm performance: a zero-sum game or mutually beneficial [J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(19): 10954.
Datsii O, Levchenko N, Shyshkanova G, et al. Creating a Regulatory Framework for the ESG-investment in the Multimodal Transportation Development [J]. Rural Sustainability Research, 2021, 46(341): 39-52.
Mooneeapen O, Abhayawansa S, Mamode Khan N. The influence of the country governance environment on corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance [J]. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2022, 13(4): 953-985.
Parfitt C. ESG integration treats ethics as risk, but whose ethics and whose risk? Responsible investment in the context of precarity and risk-shifting [J]. Critical sociology, 2020, 46(4-5): 573-587.
Peloso M E, Schmergel C E. Board Oversight in ESG-Evolving Trends in the Era of Increasing Disclosure Requirements [J]. Env't L. Rep., 2022, 52: 10637.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







