Set Theory and Third Mathematical Crisis: A Series of Events Reflected Upon the Mathematical Foundation

Authors

  • Yinhan Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/vvayt427

Keywords:

Classical Mathematics; Set Theory; Mathematical Foundation.

Abstract

The basis of mathematics remains a highly debated and prominent subject among the mathematical community. The absence of a solid mathematical basis gives rise to a range of occurrences, such as mathematical crises. There is a multitude of arguments pertaining to the Mathematical Foundation. This research aims to elucidate the need for a foundation in mathematics and examine the origins of mathematical crises via an analysis of Classical Mathematics. Subsequently, an examination of three significant mathematical crises and the subsequent evolution of Mathematics over the 19th and 20th centuries will be undertaken. The Third Mathematical Crisis is a significant component of this work. Subsequently, a comprehensive exposition will be presented on the three prominent educational institutions that emerged during the Third Mathematical Crisis. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the Third Mathematical Crisis, with a particular focus on the axiomatization of Set Theory. The process and outcome of this crisis will be thoroughly examined and discussed. There are counterexamples that challenge the notion of Set Theory as a basic theory. This paper will mostly concentrate on the subject of Category Theory. This paper provides an introduction to the genesis and identity of Category Theory, along with a concise explanation why the widespread interest among mathematicians in this field and its potential as a foundational framework for Mathematics. As a consequence, Category may serve as a fundamental basis to a significant degree.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kline M. Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times III, Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, Shanghai, 2017.

Hardy GH. A Mathematician’s Apology, Posts&Telecom Press, Beijing, 2012.

SUN Jieyuan. Ancient Mathematical Thinking of China and the West: a Comparative and Philosophic Perspective. Journal of Guangxi Normal University, 1997, 15(2): 14-18.

Odifreddi P. La matematica del Novecento Dagli insiemi alla complessità. Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, Shanghai, 2017.

Dunham W. The Calculus Gallery, Posts& Telecom Press, Beijing, 2017.

Hang Lifeng, The Impact of Mathematical Paradox on the Development of Mathematics, Journal of Shanxi Dat. ng University (Natural Science), 2011, 27(1): 94-96.

Feng Dai. The Third Mathematical Crisis in Philosophical View. Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, 2011.

Benacerraf P., Putnam H. Philosophy of Mathematics, The Commercial Press, Beijing, 2019.

HE Baojun. Gödel’s Platonism, East China Normal University, 2008.

Guo Longxian, Zhu Guiling. the Paradox of Infinite Sets and the Crisis of Mathematical Basis, Journal of Zhaotong University, 2019, 41(5): 1-5.

Jie Liu, Wen Xiang. Category Theory as Mathematical Foundation, Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology, 2014, 31(4): 7-12.

Oliver A, Smiley T. What Are Sets and What Are They For, Philosophical Perspectives, 2006, 20(1): 123-155.

Xiangwen Kong, Guichun Guo, The Transcendence of Category Theory over Set Theory: A Comparative Analysis of Mathematical Foundation, Journal of Shanxi University, 2018, 41(2): 45-50.

Downloads

Published

29-03-2024

How to Cite

Wang, Y. (2024). Set Theory and Third Mathematical Crisis: A Series of Events Reflected Upon the Mathematical Foundation. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 88, 195-202. https://doi.org/10.54097/vvayt427