Toward the Daily Sense of Referential and Meaning: Russell's Denoting Theory Revisited
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/3v5eck12Keywords:
Meaning theory; Denoting theory; Russell; Frege.Abstract
Russell's theory of descriptions was initially inspired by Frege's exploration of the significance of searching for the denotation of statements in his published paper Sense and Reference. In order to resolve the classic existential paradox - whether a propositional subject is still meaningful when it has no counterpart in the real world - Russell's theory of descriptions was proposed to provide a unique perspective and a solution using facsimiles to address such problems. In this article, we will explain how Russell's theory of facsimiles may be meaningfully applied to a relevant discussion of everyday occurrences and situations by using the fundamental notions offered in his theory. The first question that has to be answered is whether or not Russell's theory is successful in bridging the gap between fictional aspects and the subject of interpreting language used in daily life. This investigation makes an effort to shed light on this topic while also illuminating the wider link that exists between language, reference and meaning.
Downloads
References
Russell B. On denoting. Mind. 1905, 14(56): 479-93.
Hintikka J. On denoting what. Synthese. 1981, 167-83.
Parsons T. On denoting propositions and facts. Philosophical Perspectives. 1993, 7: 441-60.
Kremer M. The argument of" on denoting". The Philosophical Review. 1994, 103(2): 249-97.
Blackburn S, Code A. The Power of Russell's Criticism of Frege:'On Denoting'pp. 48-50. Analysis. 1978, 38(2): 65-77.
McDowell J. On the sense and reference of a proper name. Mind. 1977, 86(342): 159-85.
Kripke SA. Frege's theory of sense and reference: Some exegetical notes 1. Theoria. 2008, 74(3):181-218.
Klement KC. Frege and the Logic of Sense and Reference. Routledge; 2017.
Simons P. Meinong's theory of sense and reference. Grazer Philosophische Studien. 1995, 50: 171.
Segal G. A preference for sense and reference. The Journal of Philosophy. 1989, 86(2): 73-89.
Lehrer A. A theory of meaning. Philosophical studies. 2012, 161:97-107.
Putnam H. Reference and understanding. InMeaning and Use: Papers Presented at the Second Jerusalem Philosophical Encounter April 1976. 1979, 199-217. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Overton WF. Contexts of meaning: The computational and the embodied mind. InThe nature and ontogenesis of meaning 1994. Routledge.
Loar B. Two theories of meaning. Evans and McDowell. 1976, 138-61.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







