Comparison of Different Hubble Constant Measurements Approach

Authors

  • Gaomeng Xu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/8tf7wv77

Keywords:

Hubble constant; distance ladder; CMB; Hubble tension.

Abstract

As a matter of fact, the Hubble constant is a fundamental parameter describing the universe's expansion rate as well as the relationship between celestial object distances and redshifts. In reality, precisely measuring is crucial for understanding the universe's evolution, age, and its fundamental components. The Hubble constant's value is determined through diverse methods including pulsating stars, supernovae, and cosmic microwave background radiation. However, these approaches have yielded conflicting results, resulting in the Hubble constant tension. With this in mind, this study first introduces two commonly used measurement methods of Hubble constant, including distance ladder and CMB, and then compares the observation data obtained by combining these two observation methods, that is, comparing the results obtained by different measurement methods of Hubble constant. Different results were obtained. At the same time, this phenomenon was analyzed, the possible reasons were obtained, and the future development of this field was summarized and prospected.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bahcall N A. Hubble’s Law and the expanding universe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2015, 112(11): 3173-3175.

Jackson N. The Hubble constant. Living reviews in relativity, 2015, 18: 1-51.

Kirshner R P. Hubble's diagram and cosmic expansion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004, 101(1): 8-13.

Hoyle F, Narlikar K. The physics-astronomy frontier. None Physics, 1980.

Peebles P J E, Ratra B. The cosmological constant and dark energy. Reviews of modern physics, 2003, 75(2): 559.

Hubble E. A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 1929, 15(3): 168-173.

Shuyin Yang, Yuhang Tang, Aide Sha, et al. The Hubble Constant Tension in Cosmology. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2023, 10: 25.

Aghanim N, Akrami Y, Ashdown M, et al. Planck 2018 results-VI. Cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2020, 641: A6.

Riess A G, Macri L, Casertano S, et al. A 3% solution: determination of the Hubble constant with the Hubble Space Telescope and Wide Field Camera 3. The Astrophysical Journal, 2011, 730(2): 119.

Riess A G, Macri L M, Hoffmann S L, et al. A 2.4% determination of the local value of the Hubble constant. The Astrophysical Journal, 2016, 826(1): 56.

Riess A G, Casertano S, Yuan W, et al. New parallaxes of galactic cepheids from spatially scanning the hubble space telescope: Implications for the hubble constant. The Astrophysical Journal, 2018, 855(2): 136.

Riess A G, Casertano S, Yuan W, et al. Milky Way Cepheid standards for measuring cosmic distances and application to Gaia DR2: implications for the Hubble constant. The Astrophysical Journal, 2018, 861(2): 126.

Riess A G, Casertano S, Yuan W, et al. Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid standards provide a 1% foundation for the determination of the Hubble constant and stronger evidence for physics beyond ΛCDM. The Astrophysical Journal, 2019, 876(1): 85.

Gawiser E, Silk J. The cosmic microwave background radiation. Physics Reports, 2000, 333: 245-267.

Alam S, Aubert M, Avila S, et al. Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory. Physical Review D, 2021, 103(8): 083533.

Freedman W L, Madore B F, Hatt D, et al. The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble program. VIII. An independent determination of the Hubble constant based on the tip of the red giant branch. The Astrophysical Journal, 2019, 882(1): 34.

Soltis J, Casertano S, Riess A G. The parallax of ω Centauri measured from Gaia EDR3 and a direct, geometric calibration of the tip of the red giant branch and the Hubble constant. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 2021, 908(1): L5.

Rameez M, Sarkar S. Is there really a Hubble tension. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 2021, 38(15): 154005.

Mörtsell E, Dhawan S. Does the Hubble constant tension call for new physics. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2018, 2018(09): 025.

Downloads

Published

29-03-2024

How to Cite

Xu, G. (2024). Comparison of Different Hubble Constant Measurements Approach. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 88, 636-643. https://doi.org/10.54097/8tf7wv77