Descriptive comparison of ELISA and PCR methods in SARS-CoV-2 detection

Authors

  • Shuwen Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/2w49yh89

Keywords:

SARS-cov-2; RT-PCR; ELISA; Sensitivity; Specificity.

Abstract

The novel coronavirus, SARS-cov-2, is the causal agent of Covid-19, and allegedly to have a zoonotic origin. In 2019, it was reported in Wuhan, China, and declared pandemic by World Health Organization (WHO) between 2020 and 2023 soon after, to date, there are no known effective cure or treatments. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) are both commonly used testing assays for SARS-cov-2 diagnosis, but only the RT-PCR recognized as the gold standard for the detection. Despite the better sensitivity and specificity, there are certain limitations RT-PCR possesses that make ELISA more preferable. This article presents a descriptive comparison of ELISA against RT-PCR in term of sensitivity and specificity. In addition, their advantages and disadvantages on these two methods were also discussed. The comparison showed better sensitivity and specificity on RT-PCR as expected, in the aspect of methodology, RT-PCR is more complex and time consuming relative to the ELISA counterpart, which making ELISA more favorable in large-scale implementations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yuki K, Fujiogi M, Koutsogiannaki S. COVID-19 pathophysiology: A review. Clinical immunology, 2020, 215: 108427.

World Health Organization. (n.d.). Covid-19 cases|WHO COVID-19 Dashboard. World Health Organization. https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/cases?n=c.

Yüce M, Filiztekin E, Özkaya K G. COVID-19 diagnosis—A review of current methods. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2021, 172: 112752.

Sapkal G, Shete-Aich A, Jain R, et al. Development of indigenous IgG ELISA for the detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 2020, 151(5): 444-449.

Roy V, Fischinger S, Atyeo C, et al. SARS-CoV-2-specific ELISA development. Journal of immunological methods, 2020, 484: 112832.

Mehdi F, Chattopadhyay S, Thiruvengadam R, et al. Development of a fast SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA, based on receptor-binding domain, and its comparative evaluation using temporally segregated samples from RT-PCR positive individuals. Frontiers in microbiology, 2021, 11: 618097.

Klumpp-Thomas C, Kalish H, Drew M, et al. Standardization of ELISA protocols for serosurveys of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic using clinical and at-home blood sampling. Nature communications, 2021, 12(1): 113.

Luo J, Brakel A, Krizsan A, et al. Sensitive and specific serological ELISA for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Virology Journal, 2022, 19(1): 1-10.

Li D, Zhang J, Li J. Primer design for quantitative real-time PCR for the emerging Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Theranostics, 2020, 10(16): 7150.

Bustin S A, Nolan T. RT-qPCR testing of SARS-CoV-2: a primer. International journal of molecular sciences, 2020, 21(8): 3004.

Corman V M, Landt O, Kaiser M, et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Eurosurveillance, 2020, 25(3): 2000045.

Chung Y S, Lee N J, Woo S H, et al. Validation of real-time RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the early stages of the COVID-19 outbreak in the Republic of Korea. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 14817.

Alhamlan F S, Al-Qahtani A A, Bakheet D M, et al. Development and validation of an in-house, low-cost SARS-CoV-2 detection assay. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 2021, 14(9): 1139-1143.

Tee M L, Abrilla A A, Tee C A, et al. Saliva as alternative to naso-oropharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-qPCR: a multicenter cross-sectional diagnostic validation study. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 12612.

Williams T C, Wastnedge E, McAllister G, et al. Sensitivity of RT-PCR testing of upper respiratory tract samples for SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalised patients: a retrospective cohort study. Wellcome open research, 2020, 5: 1-13.

Downloads

Published

18-06-2024

How to Cite

Liu, S. (2024). Descriptive comparison of ELISA and PCR methods in SARS-CoV-2 detection. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 99, 194-200. https://doi.org/10.54097/2w49yh89