Prediction of Lung Cancer Based on Catboost
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/bcvkrh47Keywords:
Random Forest, Smote Oversampling, Catboost.Abstract
This research aims to provide guidance for achieving precision medicine by accurately predicting the incidence of lung cancer. This paper used random forest screening to identify several variables that make significant influences on the lung cancer, and used Smote oversampling to address the issue of data imbalance. Finally, this paper used Catboost to construct a model to handle categorical features. Through analyzing experimental data, can found that among the selected variables, age has the greatest importance. Afterwards, validated the model and the training score was 0.9032, indicating good results. At the same time, establish a confusion matrix to prove once again that the model has good predictive performance. Finally, based on cross validation, both the optimal validation accuracy score and the accurate validation accuracy score were above 0.9, indicating that the model performance is excellent. The innovation point of this paper is to realize precision medicine through high accuracy prediction of lung cancer.
Downloads
References
Liu Z C, Li Z X, Zhang Y, et al. Interpretation of 2020 Global cancer statistics report [J]. Journal of Integrative Oncology Therapy,2021,7(02):1-14.
FERLAY J, ERVIK M, LAM F, et al. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. International Agency for Research on Cancer[Z/OL]. [2021-02-20]. https://gco.iarc.fr/today.
Yin J, Wang M Y, YOU W C, et al. Interpretation of cancer statistics in the United States and comparison of cancer incidence in China and the United States in 2022 [J]. Journal of Integrative Oncology Therapy, 2021,8(02):54-63.
Li Yuting, Wan Shaoping, Yang Zhonghua. Research progress on influencing factors of lung cancer screening behavior [J]. China Public Health,2023,39(04):521-525. (in Chinese)
Hong, Z.Q. and Yang, J.Y. "Optimal Discriminant Plane for a Small Number of Samples and Design Method of Classifier on the Plane", Pattern Recognition, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 317-324, 1991
Hancock J T, Khoshgoftaar T M. CatBoost for big data: an interdisciplinary review[J]. Journal of big data, 2020, 7(1): 1-45
Prokhorenkova L, Gusev G, Vorobev A, et al. CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical features[J]. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2018, 31.
Al Daoud E. Comparison between XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost using a home credit dataset[J]. International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering, 2019, 13(1): 6-10.
Speiser J L, Miller M E, Tooze J, et al. A comparison of random forest variable selection methods for classification prediction modeling[J]. Expert systems with applications, 2019, 134: 93-101.
Paul A, Mukherjee D P, Das P, et al. Improved random forest for classification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2018, 27(8): 4012-4024.
Maldonado S, López J, Vairetti C. An alternative SMOTE oversampling strategy for high-dimensional datasets[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2019, 76: 380-389.
Elreedy D, Atiya A F. A comprehensive analysis of synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) for handling class imbalance[J]. Information Sciences, 2019, 505: 32-64.
Seibert R M, Ramsey C R, Hines J W, et al. A model for predicting lung cancer response to therapy[J]. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics, 2007, 67(2): 601-609.
Banerjee N, Das S. Prediction lung cancer–in machine learning perspective[C]//2020 International Conference on Computer Science, Engineering and Applications (ICCSEA). IEEE, 2020: 1-5.
Doppalapudi S, Qiu R G, Badr Y. Lung cancer survival period prediction and understanding: Deep learning approaches[J]. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2021, 148: 104371.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







