Implications for Nash Equilibrium in Intelligent Transportation Systems and Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources

Authors

  • Ziyi Zong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/63x0q214

Keywords:

Nash equilibrium; intelligent transportation systems; scarce medical resources; traffic flow modeling; healthcare allocation.

Abstract

The concept of Nash Equilibrium, originating from John Nash's seminal work in 1950, has evolved into a fundamental principle in game theory with applications across various disciplines. This essay delves into the practical implications of Nash Equilibrium, particularly in Intelligent Transportation Systems and the allocation of scarce medical resources. Through an analysis of contemporary research, this paper demonstrates how Nash Equilibrium is effectively employed in modeling traffic flows, optimizing traffic signal control, and managing route choices in transportation systems. Furthermore, it explores its application in strategically allocating medical resources during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic, ensuring efficient resource distribution and enhancing healthcare system resilience. While Nash Equilibrium offers valuable insights and strategies, its limitations in predicting stakeholder behavior and adapting to dynamic environments necessitate the development of more flexible models. Despite these challenges, the integration of Nash Equilibrium with AI holds promises for revolutionizing decision-making processes across various sectors, driving both theoretical advancements and practical applications in game theory. Overall, this study underscores the significance of Nash Equilibrium in understanding and managing strategic interactions, paving the way for improved efficiency and resilience in complex systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nash J. ‘Non-cooperative games’, Annals of Mathematics, 1950, 54(2): 286-295.

Samuelson L. Game Theory in Economics and Beyond. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2016, 30(4): 107-30.

Drouvelis M, Saporiti A, Vriend N J. Political motivations and electoral competition: Equilibrium analysis and experimental evidence. Games and Economic Behavior, 2014, 83: 86-115.

Ray-Mukherjee J, Mukherjee S. Evolutionary stable strategy. Reson, 2016, 21: 803–814.

Osborne M J, Rubinstein A. A course in game theory. MIT press, 2012.

Oszczypała M, Ziółkowski J, Małachowski J, Lęgas A. Nash Equilibrium and Stackelberg Approach for Traffic Flow Optimization in Road Transportation Networks—A Case Study of Warsaw. Applied Sciences, 2023, 13(5): 3085.

Wei W, Wu Q, Wu J, et al. Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for traffic signal control with Nash Equilibrium’, IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications, 2014: 1435-1442.

Zhou B, Song Q, Zhao Z, Liu T. A reinforcement learning scheme for the equilibrium of the in-vehicle route choice problem based on congestion game. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2020: 371.

Majumder R, Jana S, Ghose D. Game Theory-Based Decision Making for the Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the COVID-19 Situation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2024, 54(4): 2137-2148.

Sahu R, Das S, Dash S R. Nurse allocation in hospital: hybridization of linear regression, fuzzy set and game-theoretic approaches. Sādhanā, 2022, 47(170).

Downloads

Published

15-08-2024